We are ashamed to be British, who would have thought this goes on in our society? We wouldn’t think it, because we don’t know it’s going on!
That’s about to change, we have but one tool at our disposal, a tool even more powerful than social worker’s having their day in court against hapless families, that tool is The Internet a machine so vast it covers the globe in seconds. Maybe, just maybe they have met their match. If you have been on the end of “their justice” it is more than likely you have nothing more to loose, please feel at liberty to tell it like it really is, name all involved, without revealing your identity.
Say NO to gagging orders, how dare they! We know its not in the interests of the child, its in the interests of the perverse judgments and scrappy evidence that could never stand up in a ‘proper’ court furthermore it could cause a public outcry if it ever got out. We’ve had enough of the injustice and the secret courts, this must end and it must end NOW, the outcry is about to begin.
Its not enough to tell your story, naming names is imperative if this is to have any impact, provide every detail you have, car registration numbers, home addresses even add a link to www.flickr.com with their photograph. Create a profile on one of the many social networking sites, they can't afford to close them all, you will have maximum impact! The more information you provide the more they will want to close the site, the more they want to close it the more mirror sites will appear with all the same information on them, this will hurt them make no mistake, they won't like the publicity and like we care? No longer can they get away with the ability to hide behind the secret courts!
We have provided the means to "freely express" now you can have your say…
You can make your "comment" anonymously or if you are in any doubt about the traceability of your comment search for "Anonymous Surfing" and use a proxy website or go HERE then enter this Blog again by copy/paste nameshamesocialworkers.blogspot.com/ ...then say your piece, your identity remains untouchable ...the world is waiting.
Our day will come.... as will theirs
5,064 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 2401 – 2600 of 5064 Newer› Newest»exotic holidays for teachers towing the glorious party line
more investment needed in education
child protection services recruiting foster carers at around 5 times the state benefit entitlement to get children from parents on teh grounds of their relative poverty
more investment needed for education education
public sector networking EU and abroad Labour's biggest export
more investment needed protect our frontline sector
exotic holidays for teachers towing the glorious party line
councillor clean up
all persuasions
no contract with the UK
http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/5343470-public-notice-to-brethertons-cafcass-guardian-et-al
http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/5343470-public-notice-to-brethertons-cafcass-guardian-et-al
Lord Clement Jones
Liberal Democrat Treasurer
EU lobbying tailored legislation from Brussels
mute children
If Clegg cannot repatriate the illegals because we dont know where they are, how is it he can bring them into the fold ie as he set his amnesty policy during the debates if he doesnt know where they are?
Answers on the back of a postcard
April 27, 2010
Running for his life, Ed still manages to keep all the balls in the air
being fun-secretary-of-state-for-dcsf (that is fun-state-parent)
April 30, 2010
3 days later labour's last ditch election theme is that advertising crayon style
grown ups producing imagery which is supposed to look like it has been done by children
often appeals more to grown ups in belief they are identifying with children for the best
this does a bit dumb down their children by inflicting this assumption on children
who are therefore groomed to channel back the message to the parents buying in
the message the advertiser wants the parents to act on
http://blogs.channel4.com/snowblog/2010/04/30/a-car-crash-as-labour-unveils-its-posters/
Basic advertising psychology
Just forget about Labour Mum
because this lot in coalition with the EU porn merchant libdems
have your foetus earmarked in the womb given half the chance
doh only the dumbed down ones are granted civil liberty and by Labour-knows-best
Family privacy is for MPs & celebs only, under the ID database debt proposals
Balls to Harman and your EU paedophile rights
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article7108949.ece
This is scary
http://www.cpexposed.com/news/index.php#p1
Matthew Byrne was a Common Purpose Advisory Board member Merseyside and a paedophile who also enjoyed torturing prostitutes. Surprisingly he was also a Lib Dem Councillor Candidate. More surprising though is that he should be photographed rubbing shoulders with David Cameron the Conservative Party leader. As the Common Purpose connections around Cameron draw ever tighter, we wonder if he is also in the club. Leading Beyond Authority could then be expected to take precedence over party divisions?
adoption can be struck out
the key seems to be building your case on the la pick them up on everythink and keep it in the childs view,keep makeing applications to the court it seems they cannot adopt while the is outstanding applications
the family court is a game play it well
or you can go down the commercial route and lien the bastards and take everything they have !
we need to do both
Crime and Punishment: Child Protective Services Busted!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTPVm8qKu_E&NR=1
Family Courts « The Truth Is Out There
conspiraloon.wordpress.com
Uncovering a conspiracy between public authorities, Social Services, the Police, courts and Government to unlawfully take children from their parents, and pass them into a frightening and often abusive Social Services system. ..
people just have to care more about children and abuse than money cars, possessions and their own liberty !!!
what the point in being a freeman if you DONT care about others before yourself ?
Bobby Newton
My Judge (Honour Judge Jeremy Richardson QC) is very corrupt. He is pre judging my cases. He also very rude and belittles me. He literally speaks to me like a bug that gets stepped on. We are in a corrupt court system. And I tell you now, something needs to be done.
JUSICE WALL ARE YOU LISTENING ????
I have placed my complaint. I received an email today stating they intend to have it investigated by May 21st 2010. Problem is that final hearing is May 24th 2010. Also in last case 28/04/2010. I made an application to discharge interim supervision order. As soon as I stated "I made this application to discharge interim Supervision Order" he interrupted and stated "my answer to that is already no". He also pretty much stated he has made his decision BEFORE the final hearing in May 24th. I am putting an appeal in next week, but problem is he will still be the Judge for the Final Hearing.
I also tried to challenge what the local authority put before the court and he he states "this case is not about you and your partner, only the welfare of your children. And on the final hearing... I DECIDE what will happen to them". This judge is not allowing us to challenge threshold or ANYTHING. And I tried to get rid of him through media application, and I am an unlucky one who gets a section 9 QC Judge. On another note, he also DID state "I am going by the facts put before me at the beginning in the threshold from the Local Authority, and I am sticking by those facts". Its an impossible court as its a corrupt judge.
We have professional evidence to back up our claims which the judge bypasses and does not listen to.
Fay Williams
i can not believe it this is the order i received today 1,the court orders that the adoption order of 12 march 2010 is struck out,all parties must be notified immediately 2,a hearing listed for the 1 june for directions/resdence applications
i used the findings from the echr,about ss behaviour,and had pending applications to be heard to revock ect,the adoption application was heard without my notice so i appealed
judge roach made the order
At last a judge with good old fashioned common sense and just may be a heart ? Judge Roach
We need more of these less of the Potter, Polden, Green etc
REVERSE FORCED ADOPTION NOW
Why are all the common purpose graduates and supporters involved with children services running like scared rabbits
Hollie Greig case will take them all down
I am undertaking an investigation into massive child trafficking networks and activities here in the UK. I will report on findings when my interviews and findings are complete. Despite concerns mainly from family, friends and co-workers about safety issues, I am unable to turn my back on children that are suffering due to sexual abuse. This is a cause worth fighting for. I will not share information with politicians about any findings. Child trafficking and child sex slave activity are so massive that anyone revealing information may land up murdered. I ask the public to avoid re-electing any official and support only independents. PLEASE PASS AROUND!!!!!
Finally this point was made.
Brown had been allowed to get away with the absurd notion that cutting waste and tax is taking money "out of the economy". This is economic illiteracy.
2 corrupt names for the forced adoption books
Grays Inn corrupt Barristers who work for Kent County Council
Stealing children for forced adoption
Alison Moore
http://www.14graysinnsquare.co.uk/amoore.html
http://www.14graysinnsquare.co.uk/profile.php?id=12
Dylan Evans
DOESN’T JUDGE WALL THE NEW PRESIDENT OF THE FAMILY COURTS ALSO WORK OUT OF GRAYS INN CHAMBERS
ALL PALS TOGETHER IN THIS WICKED GAME OF MONEY MAKING CORRUPTION
A message for Lord Justice Wall new president of the high court family division
We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark. The real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light. Plato.
I wonder if these forced adoption websites realise that once you post something on the internet it can NEVER be erased?
The website in question, bemyparent.org.uk, has since completely REMOVED any trace of these two children from the site. Could it be that they have been made aware of this exposure of their COMPLICITY in this and other CRIMES?
Keisha-Jade & Kacey-Jaye
Former Surgeon Dr. Carley reveals the truth about Vaccines & that are being used to depopulate the planet. Get educated! LISTEN TO THIS EXPERT DISCUSS THE DANGERS OF VACCINES. Please visit her website at: www.drcarley.com Dr. Carley's son was kidnapped by CPS because she exposed too much. The US Government retaliates against anyone who exposes the truth about CPS corruption & Medical fraud.
http://tinyurl.com/vactruth
a question for Lord Justice Wall
we know you read these boards or at least government researchers do
what would you do if they stole your grandchildren, give up and go away?
or come after and expose the evil that is destroying your heritage , no it is not exclusive to the elite bloodlines
we will fight to the death just like bodica did in protecting hers
whose side are you really on, time to make a real stand ?
the overpaid common purpose stealing graduates destroying our country alongside the corrupt government, this is not law this is pure Nazi eugenics
if they can do this to us the people, who is there to stop them doing it to any of your family in the future
If it takes only one to stand up and shout "ENOUGH!"; If it takes only one to empower others; If it takes only one to light the way; If it must be me, Then so be it.
research and reform
Lord Justice Wall and others please listen to some sound advice from the real world, not the rubber stamping closed secret family court world
http://www.researchingreform.com/test/Jane.mp3
Thank you for your request for information below.
We have completed the search of our records and can confirm the following:
Prior to 2008/9 Staffordshire County Council used to receive a "Children's... See More
Services Grant", which was made up of 5 different amounts, one of which
was for "Adoption Support and Special Guardianship".
The amount of grant we received in 2006/7 and 2007/8 for this element
(i.e. adoption support and special guardianship) was £0.306m and £0.308m
respectively.
In 2008/9 the Children's Services Grant ceased and nationally the grant
was put into the general revenue support grant that Local Authorities
receive. From 2008/9 it is not therefore possible to specifically identify
the amount received for adoption support as it is within the County
Council's general grant figure.
If you have any queries or require any further information please do not
hesitate to contact me.
In the first instance if you have any comments relating to how your
request has been handled by our authority, please contact Philip Jones,
Head of Information Governance, Information Governance Unit, 1a Bailey
Street, Stafford, ST17 4BG.
If you have any further comments relating to how your request has been
handled by our authority, please contact the Information Commissioner,
Wycliffe House, Water Lane, Wilmslow, Cheshire, SK9 5AF.
Yours Sincerely
Regards
Gemma Allen
Access to Information Officer
Information Governance Unit
Law and Governance Directorate
Staffordshire County Council
The amount of grant we received in 2006/7 and 2007/8 for this element
(i.e. adoption support and special guardianship) was £0.306m and £0.308m
respectively.
Extortionate, but also explains how they have hidden adoption payments from public scrutiny. There will be a way of asking for a breakdown of the figures it is included in, as they will have figures somewhere, they are just keeping them from view.
I know a fortune has been spent on keeping my son in care for no good reason I wonder what the taxpayer will think of that waste of money!
Why is John Hemming MP associated with such a slime ball? No wonder he has been keeping his politically motivated head down. I am glad I requested my membership of JFF be removed.
http://www.barnardos.org.uk/nick_clegg-2.pdf
LOOK WHO I JUST FOUND ON BARNADOS NO TALK OF SS OR FAMILY COURTS
Manipulation of vulnerable children is deplorable, it is unacceptable for peopple to pick and chose a child from a picture or video, like they're browsing for a pet or new household items. Children are NOT commodities, and since when do they ever involve birth parents in that process??
http://www.bemyparent.org.uk/data/files/childs-agreement-to-be-featured-in-bmp-27.pdf
The costs of treating a child as if they are being auctioned on ebay.
http://www.bemyparent.org.uk/info-for-agencies/costs-and-deadlines/how-much-does-it-cost,320,AR.html
Daniel Blain
Just pictured ed balls and co as market stall holders shouting get ur kiddies like they were fruit and veg
http://staffordshiresocialservices.wordpress.com/2010/05/03/message-for-staffordshire-local-authority-please-be-law-abiding-citizens/
MESSAGE FOR STAFFORDSHIRE LOCAL AUTHORITY please be law abiding citizens
After exposing that the most nazi branch of this authority advertised children without the mothers knowledge on bemyparent the forced adoption catalogue for BAAF.
Maybe as (per usual) it is up to me to educate the Local Authority on what is lawful or not.
Before advertising children as puppies you need CONSENT yes CONSENT.
We all know that you like to think of yourselves as being ABOVE THE LAW and that you glory in the knowing that you are never faced with any accountability.
But THERE ARE laws and procedures you are ( supposed ) to follow.This may come as a shock to the many of you that are not aware of these owing to your BULLY management team. For the majority of you , you will take no notice anyway.
This is from bemyparent website stating you need CONSENT and how to go about getting it.
http://www.bemyparent.org.uk/info-for-agencies/featuring-a-child/agreement-to-publicity-and-other-consents,326,AR.html
Not how you advertised these children without the mothers knowledge that all have a sudden have DISAPPEARED from the site .
Unfortuately you did not manage to remove the evidence of you CRIME before a campaigner took a screenshot and made a video about it.
Now anyone with a subscription to bemyparent or BAAF will see that this profile no longer exists.
WHERE WILL THEY APPEAR NEXT ?
THE DAILY MIRROR ?
Please seek appropriate consent next time !!!!!
SS Human Trafficking
The support the committed couple with healthy positive values is to live a life granted preserve human rights, costs nothing and contributes to a positive economy.
[[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Yd25ejL6jU&playnext_from=TL&videos=GxYvEY1gw44&feature=recentf]]
She is a perfectly capable mum and he a capable loyal dad.
When we open our minds we understand that LEGISLATION is not as English COMMON LAW
Often the social sector seems incapable of embodying the mental capacity required to be involved with families and sensitive matters involving children at all.
Is it some sort of learning difficulty amongst the associated officials?
We have seen the Foreign Office staff of all government employees sent on urgent diversity training as it calls it, no doubt at extortionate public expense (FOI www.whatdotheyknow.com), so there is a requirement for such competency to be rolled out for Britain.
Assurances have been full of false assumptions and deception towards the best outcome of the debtmaster paymaster pulling the strings.
Hypocrisy beyond Authority, and the news presenter has been negatively briefed with false concepts for the media output. Are our MPs backed by civil servants so busy orchestrating that there is little focus on the work in hand?
And the best cover up for this wide-reaching malfeasance is to be swallowed whole by the EU via a coalition of parties great and small.
WC wrote:
Mr Cameron's new-found assertiveness was mocked by the Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg, who attracted a large and raucous crowd to a rally in Blackheath, southeast London, and accused the Tory leader of wanting to waft in to No 10 on a tide of entitlement.
"I have a simple message for David Cameron: in this country you don't inherit power, you have to earn it," he said.
---------------------------------------------
There it is, that nasty old class-warfare the left/liberals love so much. Cameron has been campaigning, putting forth plans, telling us what he would do.
Clegg has smiled for the camera, told us he is 'not like the other two parties' and, of all the cheek, told us a deal with Labour would come at a price of Clegg himself being PM. How's that for entitlement? On top of that, its more of the same tax wealth creation, tax business, more immigrants, less defense, more EU integration from Clegg. Give me Cameron any day.
Go for it Dave! You have more support than you realise.
Clegg is already being a media tart
he had a privileged background and he's very rich from the EU work experience he has milked for the campaign rounds
he has also done little but hedge his bets, over whether he'll side with nulabour or tories
or opportunistically dismiss them with a whine
to suit himself
what an insult to the British and to England
There's more information about North Wales children's homes abuse below. If there is any truth in these allegations why haven't Lord McAlpine and others been brought to justice? This man is dangerous and could still be committing crimes and getting away with it.
http://pebpr.blogspot.com
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2010/may/04/david-southall-wins-appeal
paid by LAs to do the dirty on forced removals from decent homes
public funds
families
health
http://mccannexposure.wordpress.com/2009/11/21/is-it-true-peter-mandelsons-a-paedophile/
Operation Ore teachers and other professionals in a position
http://www.seancopland.com/articles/the.cast.html
Gordon Brown said he was fighting for his life
for His life
Gordon Brown said he was fighting for his country
his Country?
the Labour vote depends on English immigrants living in Scotland and benefits from the divisiveness inherent in Scottish patriotism
But we are still English & British, Welsh & British, N / Irish / British?
these islands
the French want to call the English channel the anglo-french pond
but we already have a pond it is called the Atlantic
The Scottish ethnic Scottish might like to call themselves Europeans and Scottish
We are all Europeans amongst this lot
but we all like our boundaries
Karen Gilard Liberal standing for east cornwall, nightmare.
In to the gay agenda looking for women with children who she can try and influence?
Has been trying to make out she is important,big ego, only two other liberals in the plymouth party who ran the office, therefore no party to run.
common purpose worked with tudor evans against party lines, Tudor Evans labour leader also common purpose.
Karen Gilard is anti men although I understand she has been with a few, sounds about right for the liberal agenda.
Karen Gilard did a law degree, so did tony blair,however, when it came to the L.L.B training, she was not working for a firm of solicitors at the time, which is part of training, she would no be on the roll, the roll for solicitors. Master of the rolls keeps all names of solictors, the legal contract with the law society.
Karen Gilard did not have any post training to practice as a solicitor, no experience with clients or the courts.
Karen Gilard was in the red with money, was living off her girl friend. Has no experience as a solicitor.
thought she could train as a barrister, however, failed some of the exams, she was trying to get in to a gay temple in london,
however, they found out about her trouble making in plymouth and refused to take her on.
Has no experience of law or cases and is using the fact she did this training to push herself forward with the liberal democrats.
she has made threats to members of the public who saw through her lies and bullying.
who the hell put her name forward for a candidate for an M.P?
she is trouble the people of east cornwall dont see what comimg their way, please help
spy for the ss with sharon cox's another gay social worker
Another Liberal is judy evans common purpose friends with Karen Gilard.
She fell out with the NHS. tells big lies
why are the liberal abusing the public and getting away with it.
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=25954340&postID=5468481231513406219
Who would be silly enough to vote for the CONS ???
More cover-ups from the tories ?
If you are a leader of a council (maidstone) and also a masonic tory , looks like you can come 'down to Margate' for a weekend bender & punch-up with your brothers than pretend you come from London by getting the papers to cover for you,, then get back to running a council no questions asked ?
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/maidstone_leader_christopher_gar#incoming-84405
LA barrister copied a heap of people into his emails to take me back to court i copied all the same people into my responses to his intentions this is what i was just sent by him and my reply
you are not lawfully allowed to instruct me on anything you are not a court official or a police officer also you are a hypocrite when you have copied all these people into emails i have not INSTRUCTED you to .Take it to court ! Do your research first on statute law v common law though !!!!!!!
From: "Hodges, John (L&G)"
To: Jane Webb
Sent: Wed, 5 May, 2010 17:16:48... See More
Subject: RE: Jamie and Mitchell
Ms Smith
I have no intention of prolonging this exchange of e-mails.
Please accept the request in my previous e-mail re recipients of e-mails relating to the ongoing court proceedings as an instruction and not a request.
Mr John Hodges
Principal Solicitor
Law and Governance
16 Martin Street
Stafford
ST16 2LG
Who Do they think that they are take them to the cleaners and who do they think they are calling you a hypocrite when its them who are acting un-lawfully and who are lying in court and allowed to get away with doing it they make me sick i feel for you
The systematic destruction of the family unit designed to ensure the next generations become ever increasingly dependent on the state, thus easier to control and manipulate!!!
cherry picked by cafcass common purpose graduate social worker
Name Pat(ricia) WALTON (Mrs)
Title/Professional Post: Director Social Care, Together Trust (previously Boys & Girls Welfare Society), Schools Hill, Cheadle, Cheshire SK8 1JE
Acting as an Independent Social Worker, I have undertaken numerous assignments (both on my own behalf and on behalf of Together Trust Social Work Services), including the production of independent reports in public and private law proceedings, instructed by children’s solicitors, parents/grandparents solicitors, and local authorities. I have been commissioned to provide external case consultancy in difficult matters – e.g. sexual abuse cases and multi-placement problems. I have undertaken a number of independent assessments for local authorities – e.g. as an independent complaints investigator, assessing appropriate placements, undertaking an independent abuse inquiry. Have undertaken training for solicitors for entry to the children’s panel.
General Social Care Council Registration No: 1020485
PROFESSIONAL/EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS
NVQ 5 Strategic Management, 2004
Diploma in Business Coaching, 2001
Postgraduate Certificate in Advocacy with Young People, Staffordshire University 2000
M.A. Child Care Law and Practice, Keele University 1991
Certificate – The Handicapped Person in the Community, O.U. 1976
Teeside Polytechnic (and Diploma in Social Work Distinction)
CQSW (Certificate of Qualification in Social Work) 1973
OTHER RELEVANT QUALIFICATIONS
NYAS (IRCHIN) Trained Advocate (Representation of Children and Young People)
The Common Purpose Programme – graduated August 2001
Trained Family Conciliator and RELATE (marriage guidance) counsellor.
Advanced Award in Social Work – 60 credits
EMPLOYMENT
Director Social Care Together Trust 1999 – date
Line management responsibility for a number of social care services including fostering, adoption and residential services. Senior Management lead for the Training Department, Personnel Department and Social Work Services. Have continued to undertake independent assessments as part of social work services.
Employment with BGWS (Together Trust) since 1993 initially as Guardian ad litem and Panel Manager for Guardian ad Litem Service.
Family Placement BGWS (now Together Trust) 1996 - 1998
Development Manager
Established the BGWS Family Placement Service, alongside managing the GALRO Panel.
Panel Manager BGWS (now Together Trust) 1993 – 1998
Full time employed GALRO Panel Manager Cheshire Panel. Employed by BGWS who managed the contracted out service. Also continued to act as Guardian ad Litem on Stockport, Tameside and Trafford Panel. During time as Panel Manager investigated complaints on behalf of other Panels.
Tutor Lancaster University 1991 & 1992 (part time)
Tutor on Post Qualifying/MA Child Protection Course.
Independent Visitor Family Fund Trust 1990 – 1997 (part time)
Further work on self employed basis, grant giving to families with disabled children.
Independent Children’s IRCHIN and ASC 1987 – 1995
Advocate
Freelance work.
Consultant/Trainer BAAF (British Agencies for 1987 – 1990 (part time)
Adoption and Fostering)
North West Regional Consultant/Trainer.
Independent Various organisations 1984 – 1998
Guardian ad Litem
Representing children in public law proceedings.
1984–1987 Birmingham, 1987–1998 Tameside, Trafford, Stockport, Manchester and Cheshire. Some dates overlap because I was a freelance self employed Guardian and also had part time employment.
Senior Practitioner Dudley Road Hospital, 1980 – Jul 1983
Birmingham (part time)
Child & Family Guidance (family therapy).
Independent Visitor Family Fund Trust 1978 - 1985
Work on self employed basis, grant giving to families with disabled children.
Co-ordinator and Tutor Bournville College, Birmingham 1978 – 1980 (part time)
Certificate in Social Service (inc maternity leave, 2nd
child born Dec 79)
Social Work Practitioner ) Newcastle upon Tyne Social 1973 – Sep 1977
Subsequently Team Manager ) Services Department (1st child born Nov 77)
ADDITIONAL EXPERIENCE THROUGH VOLUNTARY WORK
1983 – 1987
Trained and practiced as a Counsellor with RELATE (formerly Marriage Guidance Council).
Founder member of Child Concern – multi-disciplinary charity furthering the training of professionals working with children and families. Completed two terms as member of committee (trustee). Remain as member to date.
if you love family courts , paedophiles and immigration labour , cons and lib dems are the party for you
not forgetting statute law , micro chipping , barcodes , cctv , police state , sexualising of children etc etc
in fact if you plan to vote for any of the above instead of a tick write baaaaa .... sheeple
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5008739840732779226&postID=6630618154503349584
http://www.facebook.com/pages/David-Cameron-wants-change-Give-him-30p-and-tell-him-to-Fk-Off/115547365137261
All David Cameron says is "We want change, we need change...change...change..."
Ok Give him 30p and tell him to F**K off. Let's face it, if Dave here was elected Prime Minister, this country would be more doomed than it is already!
Clare Bear
JANE THEY DID THE SAME TO ME THEY TRY TO PUSH YOU JUST THAT LITTLE BIT TO FAR
THEY TRY THEIR VERY BEST TO GET PARENTS TO KILL THEMSELVES AND FAMILIES TO BE SILENCED BY FEAR
GUESS WHAT ARSEHOLES WE ARE NO LONGER AFRAID
when talking to people who seem to think that the EU is a good idea or say 'we're wasting a vote if we dont vote for one of the 3 main parties' I ask them "Do you want your children and grandchildren growing up under a dictatorship?". Bear in mind EU laws now comprise some 84% of all British legislation.
Social workers' accounts of violence - 05/05/2010 - Community Care
www.communitycare.co.uk
A social worker who wants to remain anonymous who received death threats from a service user tells us about his ordeal. He was later forced to move to another area:
What a shame. I don't condone violence but hey if they are brave enought to pervert the course of justice, they should be brave enough to accept the consequences of the lying behaviours.what the hell do they expect : A certain line manager once told me about cutting a few social workers down to size, when they decided to complain to her about the hostile and erratic behaviour of a mother, whilst they were in the throws of removing her 5 yr old son...The LM asked them what they would do if someone walked uninvited into there home and proceeded to remove their child. One of them immediately said, I give them a good slapping, they wouldnt try it again....'Exactly' she said,now go away..
http://www.tribune.ie/news/article/2010/may/02/mater-consultant-still-working-with-children-durin/
A medical consultant in the Mater hospital who is under investigation for child sexual abuse has been allowed to continue working with children, the Sunday Tribune has learned.
It is understood that the consultant had offered to step back while the investigation was continuing but that this was deemed unnecessary.
He was allowed to continue working directly with children with another person present in order to guarantee patient safety.
Niall Muldoon, national director of Children At Risk in Ireland (Cari), said allowing the consultant to continue working in such circumstances was a "very unusual scenario".
The guidelines recommend that once a person is accused of sexual abuse they should be moved away from contact with children. This is as much to protect the accused as the children because it leaves the accused open to further allegations of abuse.
"If the accused remains in contact with the children, it undermines the seriousness of the allegation and preempts the outcome," Muldoon added.
A spokesman for the Mater hospital confirmed the investigation was in train and was being conducted by the HSE.
"The Mater hospital is co-operating fully with the investigation, which is being led by the HSE," the spokesman said last week. A spokesman for the HSE refused to confirm or deny that the executive was involved in any investigation into a medical consultant in the Mater hospital.
The complaint against the consultant was made by the mother of the child at the centre of the investigation.
The investigation has been ongoing for some weeks. The hospital was unable to give any indication as to when it would conclude.
It is understood the consultant and the hospital are keen to investigate the allegation fully as both the individual's reputation and that of the hospital are on the line.
It is policy of all hospitals that any complaint of sexual abuse against children be fully investigated on a 'children first' basis and in accordance with procedure, no matter how spurious the claim may initially appear to be.
May 2, 2010
Baroness Tonge fired from UK party post for seeking truth
www.paltelegraph.com
FIRED FOR CALLING FOR AN INDEPENDENT ENQUIRY IN TO ORGAN THEFT BY THE ISRAELI EARTHQUAKE RELIEF TEAM IN HAITI.....SEEMS NICK WISHES TO SQUASH ANY POSSIBILITY OF THE SCANDALOUS TRUTH.
NEWS MOORE STEPS UP SEX TRAFFICKING CAMPAIGN Music, movie & Entertainment News
www.pr-inside.com
DEMI MOORE has stepped up her campaign against child sex trafficking - th e actress met with lawmakers at the White House to discuss the issue on T uesday (04May10).
kent messenger & co brought and paid for by the conservatives run kent county council
Changes at council ( Maidstone) to save £200,000)
What they mean is another of the many common purpose graduates such as david petford , mike fuller chief constable kent police , peter Gilroy common purpose speaker have all been moved on or been given the push !
all involved in child abuse & child trafficking and covering it up in kent
remember kendall house children abuse home in gravesend....we do
Karen Gilard Liberal Party is telling lies about her law rtraining, she only did a dregee, never trained as a solicitor has no experience of clients or courts, only trouble making and common purpose.
Paul Carter the tory leader of Kent County council is a outright CUNT and should be shot on sight not mingling with the common purpose organised business talks at the county show in detling
Karen Gilard, liberal, she did not get a pupillage, when was she called to the Bar?
they have reguations in place to practice and what about the code of conduct?
no evidence only did a law degree, and took it no further had money troubles. She lost her seat in plymouth now she is trying to abuse the people of east cornwall someone needs to tell them quick.
up to her neck with common purpose and corruption in plymouth.
Andrew leigh ukip freemason
why should these M.Ps get off with corruption
Lib-Dem subject like all M.Ps to the party wip control.
they should be standing for the people and not themselves, what is Karen Gilard doing standing in east cornwall. she is evil
anti-normal women has a gay agenda.
http://www.facebook.com/event.php?ei...5277714&ref=mf
National Not Voting Conservative Day
Type:
Causes - Rally
Date:
Thursday, May 6, 2010
Time:
7:00am - 11:00pm
Location:
All across the UK
Conservative run councils are taking the children NOW FOR FORCED ADOPTION so what will change apart from more of the same
same horse just a different jockey
just like potter versus wall
be wary of xenophobia masking as patriotism and vice versa
We are a modern European country and we need some serious business like people to get hold of this cp situation for the better
ditch some of the labels and the class anxiety and vote wisely make sure you know what you are voting for
think about others not just your own self
research and know your independent or your small party candidate
are they up to the job locally and nationally
and for the animal welfare vote, remember animals aren't going to take care of our children... or families... or innovate technology in the environment
but sound legislation can help animals
What is going on in the secret family courts.
Are they really stealing and abusing our children in care as a social
engineering human genome project? Why are paedophile rings involving top
elites in Scotland and the UK, being protected? What evil secret
society is behind this abuse and destruction of innocent families?
Last night four parliamentary candidates in Plymouth, Linda Gilroy
labour, Judy Evans Liberal, Oliver Covile Tory and Andrew Leigh UKIP all
standing in the ward for Sutton and Devonport in Plymouth at a hustings
meeting.
All FOUR refused to sign the pledge for Hollie
Greig/campaign/pledge on paedophilia.
Nationwide cover up, involving high ranking Elite?? My MP Tim Farron Lib Dem for Westmorland and Lonsdale has known about this, has been asked to raise this as an election issue and has failed to do so. They are all corrupt in my book!!!
r
Google Holly Grieg. Open your eyes wide. Get to know what is really going on and who is suppressing this TRUTH from getting into the PUBLIC domain?
http://ukstolenchildren.com/2010/05/01/elle-may-ruby-lacey-poppy-williams-piper/
Elizabeth
Same sort of thing has been done to my family as i am the eldest daughter of Baroness Smith, the late labour leader John Smith’s widow.
Article - Family Courts 'jolly good fun' ? invite to Lord Justice Wall
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/article_family_courts_jolly_good#incoming-84352
2 May 2010
Dear Dear Lord Justice Wall - President of the High Court Family
Division
Having forwarded a copy of the following email. I would like to
know if judges are paid for their contributions or if this is done
on a voluntary basis. If paid please provide the sums involved
encompassing all judges and records held.
I would also like to invite you and/or others to attend any of the
‘Child snatching by the State’ events that will be occurring
throughout the country. You are most welcome to put forward the
stance from the family courts perspective and will meet many
families with ‘first-hand knowledge of children’s social services
and the family courts’ who have shown great courage in adversity,
yet still show compassion and understanding for others, safe in
their knowledge that through love there is no separation.
I hope you will forgive this invitation being placed in the public
domain, but feel it is within the best interests of honesty
openness & transparency, in keeping with the justice system fully
engaging with families whose decisions affect so many children &
families lives.
Article - Family Courts 'jolly good fun' ?
Dear Judge Isobel Plumstead
I am absolutely disgusted to read the following article sent to me
by distraught parents who have had their children stolen by social
services in secret closed family courts; having attended the recent
‘Child snatching by the state’ conference in Stafford.
http://www.bemyparent.org.uk/features/it...
I have no reason to doubt these parents & grandparents accounts/
experiences of social services and the family courts, having
resigned from the Conservative party due to Conservative Kent
County Council taking my own offspring of 4 young granddaughters
for the exact same fate.
Many like myself bitterly regret seeking the advice & assistance of
social services and believe they should come with a government
'health warning'
Could it be that I was hoping to raise the exact same concerns,
encompassing the lack of support for families by social services
and transparency & accountability within the system?
Forgive me for not finding it ‘ jolly good fun’ to be removed from
the court (without my consent) and my granddaughter’s lives
forever, through fear of social services canvassing for my own
young children. Having been lucky enough to be advised against
being bullied into‘ psychological testing’ by a gentleman who also
attended the conference called Ian Josephs an Ex Kent County
Councillor (Conservative)
You may find his website of interest
http://www.forced-adoption.com/introduct...
Nor do I believe the children will find it ‘ jolly good fun’ when
they realise as adults what has happened to them; many have been
abused within the ‘care’ system and separated from their siblings,
to then be given to strangers rather than blood kin, who dearly
love & care for them.
What I am certain of, is that they will want to know who is
ultimately responsible.
regards
Cllr Sheena Williams ( Independent – Maidstone Borough Councillor)
Princess Diana
http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/january/15/newsid_2530000/2530603.stm
tonyb 1 may 1997
campaigner for children and HR
If you are too young to remember
31 August 1997 united the nation in extraordinary grief over Princess Diana's untimely death
did it make the UK public putty in lab's hands
these PMs are sujected to the discipline of the party wip, they have made this up to control the MPs, is this legal under common law?
Their is the spirit of the law, not just the letter of the law.
people have been push aside, but no more, what we do and say is for all of us, that have suffered.
People power.
the government is and have been helping out the bankers and not the people,they have treated us badly. we do need to get out of the UK and soon, stop common purpose
the illegal and unjustice system run by spin and corruption, by the labour party spin doctors and common purpose's hidden agenda, have treated the people of the uk with contempt.
their maybe a few judges who do not like the way the people have been treated, wait and see what happens.
People like Karen Gilard for the liberals, standing in east cornwall gives the justice system a bad name, trying to be what she is not and never will be with her gay friends, supporting the hidden agenda of common purpose.
Hollie Greig case
Lab stronghold in Brown's, Darling's Scotland
scandleson, bradshaw, johnson, milibandharman
paedophile agenda snuffing out English and selling children
disenfranchised many couldn't even vote and police were quickly called in
google Alan Johnson (labour) regained seat) homosexual
brace yourself
http://www.dpjs.co.uk/sex.html
the Labour government and the chief execs of the LAs consists of this creeping agenda
Balls stayed in Morley & Outwood, Tories fell short to get him out. Lab dcsf do seem to be basing their sexuality on the curriculum in primary schools programme on questionable material, because some disturbing research has turned up.
In amongst it there is talk of reassignment of sexuality at birth which might relate to the adoption scandals.
very much each-to-their-own amongst adults if it cause no harm to other adults,
but are the parents of England & Wales here bothered about this agenda being imposed on children?
Conservative have gained in our area
Oh dear seems Cabbage Patch might be playing tug of war with Bungle Brown
does anyone know how Brian done ?
NORTH YORKSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL DENY A MOTHER ADEQUATE FINANCIAL SUPPORT FOR HER DAUGHTER WHO IS ON A FULL CARE ORDER, THEY HAVE OFFERED ONLY £30 PER WEEK UNTIL CHILD TAX CREDITS ARE AWARDED, MUM REQUESTED £50, YET THEY PAY FOSTER CARERS £400-700 PER WEEK FOR CHILDREN
Karen Gilard liberal lost her seat in east cornwall or any attempt to get a seat.
I know the tory got in this has to be bettr for the people of the area.
It would appear that her girl friend was paying her fees for the elections.
oops naughty john hemmings no wonder hes not bothered about mkfs trying it on with vulnerable parents
Shortly after his election in 2005, he made headlines when it was revealed that he was the father of a child with his personal assistant and fellow councillor Emily Cox, but that he would stay with his wife and her three children. His wife Christine commented that she forgave him and is standing by him, as he has always ... See Morebeen honest about his extramarital affairs, of which she said this was "about number 26".[9][10] Following the publication of details of the affairs, Hemming voted for himself for the News of the World's 'Love Rat of the Year' competition.
SOCIAL SERVICES - HAVE CONTACTED ANN GREIG - SAYING THAT THEY ARE CONCERNED ABOUT HOLLIE Ann Greig has just phoned me and asked for me to please circulate the following information. Social Services in Shrewsbury (a woman by the name of Paula Morris) rang Ann Greig
Unfortunately the SS can go to court and get an order to remove Hollie from Ann, this all very legal and above board under the vunerable persons act. They did this to an elderly person recently and forced them into an old peoples home and removed the care from the daughter. They used these laws to stop Kerry and Mark getting married to try to remove thier baby at birth, this why they fled to Ireland and fighting things from there, I would suggest that Ann and Hollie are now immediately moved to a place of safety untill she knows what they are proposing. I know of a place or 2 they could go for now. If we have any details of the now MP for her area shouuld be contacted and any other official to help bring awareness of the real threat to Hollie. It wont matter that Ann allows them to see Hollie or talk. They can get a court order without letting Ann know its happening. They will use "emotional Harm" and a Judge will stamp the order. Having been in enough court hearings where these statements are used to remove parental rights and Advocate rights, Ann needs to get Hollie to a safer enviroment untill she knows what the SS want from her. Then if the SS do go to court in the mean time, (which has probably already been set up from the scottish pead Judges to the Shropshire courts) and an order obtained, they cant actually get to Hollie.
'Maxims of Common Law' Are Ignored In Family Court
Courts make determinations in law and in equity. By 'in law' is meant following a specific law - constitutional law, state law, etc. By 'in equity' is meant determining what is 'fair' to do where now law specifically rules. An example is determining how to distribute the assets in a divorce among the husband and wife.
Common law refers to the myriad of decisions made by judges and appeals courts. Maxims of Common Law are 'guiding truths'. Adhering to them helps judges make fairer decisions. They're ignored in family court determinations since fairness is a wholly secondary issue. This article overviews what these maxims are.
Maxims are absolutely essential to the preservation of rights and fair treatment to all litigants. Maxims:
* represent 'self-evident' truth - as mentioned in our Declaration of Independence when it referred to 'all men' as being created equal.
* serve to guide judicial determinations in the same way that 'axioms' guide the analysis of mathematical determinations
* promotes fair dealing and unbiased justice - a clearly essential issue in the purpose of courts
Courts, primarily established to enforce the principles of common law, are bound by common law rules of equity that should be grounded in the never-changing maxims. This grounding serves to restrain the court's wanton discretion in equity law determinations.
Examples of Maxims:
Let's take a look at some examples to see the nature of maxims -as self-evidently fair. Here's an important one:
*The certainty of a thing arises only from making a thing certain.
This implies that the court should seek clear proof of allegations made against someone and not rule on just the allegations or weakly supported ones. Family court ignores these maxims all the time.
*The safety of the people cannot be judged but by the safety of every individual.
Laws which supposedly protect the safety of some people at the expense of other people's rights violate this maxim. A clear example of such a violation is present day domestic restraining order laws which are rampantly and unjustly imposed upon so many fathers.
*Law is unjust where it is uncertain or vague in its meaning.
Laws should be clear so that one knows precisely when he's breaking such a law. Remember the violation of laws brings consequences on those who violate them. Vague laws are considered unconstitutional. An example of vague standard of law is the 'best interest of the child' standard - used to unjustly deny fit fathers custody of their children.
*The Burden of Proof lies on him who asserts the fact -not on him who denies it.
This is based on the fact that you can't prove a negative. Courts that force people to prove a negative are examples of kangaroo courts. Family courts jail fathers when they can't prove that they don't have money to pay!
*No one should be believed except upon his oath.
This simply means that anyone who will give testimony must be sworn in. That way he can be charged with perjury - which is a felony (a serious crime) - if he can be found to be intentionally lying. No 'swearing in' means no perjury and no penalty for lying.
*Perjured witnesses should be punished for perjury and for the crimes they falsely accuse against him.
This is the bottom line of enforcing honesty in court testimony. Unfortunately perjury is almost never punished -allowing the degradation of court integrity - so obvious in family court.
*Every home is a castle; though the winds of heaven blow through it, officers of the state cannot enter.
This is from English common law which made a man's home sacrosanct. It should still be true. It requires officers to have warrants to enter a home. A warrant is permission from a judge based on good cause to enter a home.
*No man should profit by his own wrong or, He who does not have clean hands, cannot benefit from the law
This is self-evident. An extreme case is the child that pleads mercy because he's an orphan - but only because he murdered his parents.
*He who uses his legal rights harms no one.
But, fathers are routinely punished by seeking their rights in family court.
*No one is punished unless for some wrong act or fault.
But forced into the noncustodial status for doing no wrong would be considered punishment by any reasonable person.
*It's natural that he who bears the charge of a thing, should receive the profits.
If you have all the obligations for something but none of the benefits, then you are a slave.
Fathers and mothers who go to family court observe clear violations of these maxims all the time. Such violations mean that there is a tyranny taking place.
Mother's dismay as pervert goes free after sex assault on daughter, 6 | Mail Online
www.dailymail.co.uk
David Stothers was given a three year community order for a sex assault in which he ordered the woman's six-year-old daughter to indecently touch him.
No doubt he will become an MP or go work for social services when he has beaten is fake drink excuse, err I mean addiction
A national voting fraud has taken place. Disgusting. Undemocratic. Everyone should take up the position of Lawful Rebellion
s No matter what the public opinion is, the party elected has already bee pre-determined before anyone goes to the polls.
No ones surprised by the 'man of straw' whose own family leaves alot to be desired , cocaine dealing son & nounce brother
Press still silenced, despite family court reforms, say lawyers - Times Online
business.timesonline.co.uk
One year after ground-breaking reforms that were meant to open thousands of hearings to the media, more family courts are now more closed to public scrutiny, it is claimed today.
A very brave lady ex-councillors family has been targeted for racial abuse , maybe she also stood her ground and told the truth
Two professional criminals, a PC and her thug
doorman boyfrind, have been allowed to leave the UK after GBH and false
evidence to court, while their victim was tried for D&D, and found
not guilty, when the true facts came out in hid defence. The CPS and
POLICE in Cumbria are criminals too, the way they handled this case
I believe they have set a president in law. Now there should be no objections in future to McKenzie friends helping their own families in Court. WE CAN ALL USE THIS TO OUR OWN ADVANTAGE.
Yvonne Stewart-Taylor
John Hemming has known about our case for 5 years, he and my own MP and Henry Bellingham and all MP's. None have done anything to help us get justice or exposure for the wrongs we have endured over 7 years. They are all corrupt and they do not care about us.
Hemming asked me to work as a McKenzie for JFF. I already take work from MFJ and PAIN. He has not given me any cases, so I assume he just wants to keep me under control. No chance.
Lorraine Newhill
HAPPY 5th BIRTHDAY TAMISCHA NEWHILL, FROM YOU REAL FAMILY XXXX we ALL Love and miss you sweety
And so say all of us Mr Wall you should be thoroughly ashamed of your profession and it matters not how much you tighten up the family courts because WE WILL BE OPENING THEM FOR YOU
The mp for Oxford West and Abingdon lost his seat in parliament, THIS MP WOULD NOT HELP ME SAVE A CENTRE FOR ABUSED CHILDREN FROM CLOSING, SO VERY PLEASED HES GONE
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT! ... STAFFORD CHILDRENS SERVICES WILL SHORTLY BE SUBJECT TO AN INDEPTH INVESTIGATION FOR: TORTURE, CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY AND CHILD KIDNAPPING. THE RESULTS WILL PUBLISHED
spare a thought today for the missing children stolenfrom their loving parents by lying and corrupt social workers and court officials such as Baby Hayden stolen by ESSEX County Council
http://www.craigandsarahandhayden.webs.com/
this is hayden smith,happily playing on the floor with his toys prior to essex county council forcing through an order to put him in 'temporary care' despite bountiful proof he was thriving with his parents
Well done for exposing more of the child and people will soon discover my own son Alex has also been thieved by Lincoln and Stafford SS aided and abetted by Solicitors BridgeMcFarland and Langleys. BAAF has consent forms disguised as medical notes so my advice is DON'T SIGN ANYTHING THAT... THE SOCIAL SERVICES PLACE IN FRONT OF YOU!
Fife Council Social Services have literally three weeks left to apologise to my fiance, otherwise the full extent of the horrendous treatment that they inflicted upon my fiance and the documentary evidence will be published, not only on here, but also in the UK media. The reason I am so confident of this, is that what Fife Council have said in their own paperwork, is so shocking, that stopping our wedding will seem like nothing compared to these revelations. Upon receiving certain paperwork, thanks to a very kind whistle blower from Fife Council, we were astonished at what we found. Fife Council Social Services have until the 31st May 2010 to publicly apologise to my fiance and to admit that they are evil lying scumbags, otherwise it will all be published. And I'm 99% percent sure they won't bother apologising, which will make things all the more worse. And they definitely read our site, this we know for sure, as they had one of their lawyers make a statement about it in an article in the Sun newspaper. I personally make a gentleman's agreement that if Fife Council are to publicly apologise to my fiance and son, and admit that they are "evil, lying scumbags" then I won't publish it and I'll save them further embarrassment. But I need to hear the words "evil, lying scumbags" or it won't count!
Are social services guilty of abusing children while they are still in the womb
We all know the witchunts social services lead against you when they see an opportunity for a forced adoption . This can have an adverse effect on the unborn child. Rather than minimise stress they seem to wish to create more for expectant mothers is this tantamount to corporate child abuse ?
Babies in womb feel mothers’ anxiety at only four months
http://staffordshiresocialservices.wordpress.com/
The answer is YES !!!
http://ukstolenchildren.com/2010/05/01/elle-may-ruby-lacey-poppy-williams-piper/
Elle-May, Ruby, Lacey & Poppy [Williams-Piper]
http://flwblog.lawweek.co.uk/
Family Law Week
Panel Minutes
I had a salutary reminder recently of how useful it can be getting hold of minutes of internal meetings held within the local authority which are not routinely disclosed. Thanks to the Guardian in the case who badgered the local authority to produce the minutes of the Adoption Panel the court was able to see the natural and unvarnished attitude of the social work team towards a parent in the case. I can think of a number of other cases in which these sorts of minutes have been useful. In one instance an Adoption Team Manager gave evidence that a child could be placed for adoption within 6 months. The following day we received the minutes of the adoption needs meeting which showed that her realistic time estimate in relation to the particular child was actually that it would take at least a year to place her. In two other cases the Panel minutes revealed that blatant lies were told to the Panel by social workers (for example, that a child had been injured when they had not and that the care plan approved by the court did not involve a recommendation for direct contact post adoption). Strategy meeting minutes can also be useful in identifying the approach of professionals to a case from the very outset. Running records and documents which follow the trail of internal decision making within the local authority can also be extremely helpful. There is clear case law reminding local authorities of their duties to disclose documents and in theory, according to Munby J, a suitably experienced legal practitioner from the local authority should identify any relevant records from the files and disclose them. When this case was first reported there was a flurry of requests for extensive and arguably unnecessarily burdensome automatic disclosure. Whilst things have settled down it is always worth seeking specific disclosure if you start to get a feeling in your bones that strange decisions have been made or that a social worker has formed a view that does not seem to marry up with your impression of the client.
Karen Gilard Liberal who was trying to get to be an M.P failed thank god because Karen is a very mixed up person, she only got the votes on the back of the last M.P Colin Breed, who appeared to be a good Guy and held his own views, not just that of the party's leader.
We know its all a game.
we now need juries in the family court
No one got in other than a green,
and we know what that a agenda is
Karen Gilard is still thinking that she got in, in east cornwall?
Only got the vote from the last MP.
HE WAS NOTHING LIKE HER, HER GAY FRIENDS AND COMMON PURPOSE AGENDA.
SHE IS A DANGER
a lot od people did not get in, however, we continue against the corruption, more of us than them.
Barry Kell cheif ex Plymouth city council, fraud on voteing forms, common purpose in with Linda Gilroy labour, she lost her seat, corrupt old cow, we now have a tory fool instead, wait and see what shit he does.
nothing has changed yet, but we live in hope
did people vote or was it media spin controling the election, on mass, like the usa?
people need to wake up, as they are controlled, what will we get now, the rule of the banker, not the people.
I understand that no MP has signed the pledge for Hollie.
Fay Williams is recovering form attending the riged election count,where they had the independents names on the voteing forms in different fromat that the main parties,ballot boxes dissapared,and there was no book of the rules on site of the count????
Hemsworth Social Services Stole my Kids on Lies
www.youtube.com
our fight against the social services. If you can help please contact me on this number... 07789691702 or 07796672187
This is what the wicked bastards are doing to ‘real ‘ families and it WILL STOP and WE WILL MAKE every last one of you accountable for your actions one way or another
Are you listening MR WALL ???
Maura Durell
Sorry to hear this, it's seems that two tops from a packet of cornflakes and passing a few exams maketh social worker! ( i have worked with some amazing social workers but they are out numbered by the morons unfortunatly) expierience expierience expierience!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! has the systeme heard of this? is there anyone that cares enough.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!? i did my time 11 years as a 'professional' foster parent, what i saw and expierienced was disgusting!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!God help people in need. Peace and love.
were did Karen Gillard do her pupillage, what was the name of the chambers.
In any case she is bad news we know from all the experience and
case's that the law societ, the justice system is corrupt.
these are some of the worse types about, you can not trust the courts, judges, barristers, lawyers, and social workers.
they think it gives them a good name and builds their ego's at the same time, while they use public money for their dirty tricks against us.
I understand that Karen Gillard is two face old cow.
She is giving the liberals a bad name, nick doesnt care, I feel sorry for the girl friend.
these people think they are so important
chief executive and electoral registration officer for the UK.
some think was not right with the voting forms, we need to check out who produces the forms for voting, as their appears to be a bias towards the three main parties.
is it the head of the council run by an hidden agenda of common purpose and the freemasons?
well done to anyone who was standing. the election was run by the sky news, bbc media, and spin.
I think they all feed of the situaton
Yvonne Stewart-Taylor
This family belong to a friend of mine, who has also served on the council for many years. If they can steal our children, they can get yours too, no one is immune from this evil corrupt practice, not even police and social workers, they steal teachers children too.
Elle-May, Ruby, Lacey & Poppy [Williams-Piper] « UK Stolen Children
ukstolenchildren.com
Maternal grandmother is Maidstone Borough Cllr Sheena Williams who resigned from the Conservative party due to them stealing her granddaughters for forced adoption.
How to avoid prison and commit all crimes possible, join your local lodge
Dyslexia expert avoids prison over child porn
A WORLD-renowned expert in child dyslexia has avoided being sent to prison despite being caught with almost 7,000 indecent images of children on his computer.
Retired Hull University lecturer Dr Christopher Singleton admitted nine counts of accessing indecent images and was given a suspended prison sentence by a judge at Hull Crown Court.
The 65-year-old had more than 6,734 indecent images on his computer – 1,000 at the most serious level – downloaded over a three-year period from 2006. He was caught as part of an international operation against online paedophiles.
Singleton, who has worked with hundreds of children in developing the world's first computer programme to test five-year-olds for dyslexia, was arrested last February.
His arrest came days after he spoke at a British dyslexia conference – and his work was deemed so important the Government used it to shape their policy on dealing with child dyslexia.
At the crown court, Judge Roger Thorn QC told Singleton: "You have come to the end of your professional career aged 65 and it has ended in such a disastrous way for you. That's its own punishment.
"You are a psychologist and have spent your professional life in that discipline and had a special interest in child development. You, of all people, must be aware these are not victimless crimes. You have lectured on child abuse.
"That's a gross hypocrisy when you were doing it yourself. Behind every one of these ghastly pictures there was a real child."
In mitigation, Anil Murray said Singleton was "overwhelmed with shame and remorse".
Mr Murray said: "This defendant began having an interest in art and would draw nude paintings using naked pictures. That's how he started going on the internet.
"He accepts he moved on and went further than that. He began looking at porn.
"He says he never deliberately searched for child porn. He wants to reassure the public that his role was not to be in contact with children when he did his research."
Singleton, of Hull Road, Cottingham, was investigated by the Internet Sex Offender Investigation section of Humberside Police last February as part of Operation Typhoon.
He was given a 12-month prison sentence, suspended for three years, and ordered to undertake a sex offenders' programme.
He was also placed on the sex offenders' register for 10 years, given a Sexual Offences Prevention Order and told he has to show his computer to the police on a regular basis.
Singleton retired from Hull University last June after 40 years. He has published four books on child dyslexia and observed more than 400 five-year-old schoolchildren for two years in the early 90s. His software is also in 6,000 schools nationwide and is used internationally.
Over the course of his career, Singleton has published 100 papers on his specialist subject of child dyslexia.
Sentencing Singleton, the judge said: "This is a dreadfully shameful period for you. There are those in court who will forgive you, whether or not you forgive yourself is another matter."
Social worker's list of failures
Council chiefs have 'revolutionised' the way social workers record cases after a former employee was struck off.
Alcus Dunn is banned from practising as a social worker after a catalogue of failures while working for Herts County Council.
The General Social Care Council's Conduct Committee made the decision when it met to consider his case last month (April).
It found that he had put vulnerable children at risk of harm.
Among the errors were Mr Dunn's failure to keep adequate records, or in some instances, any records at all in relation to the cases on his workload.
He did not report one missing child to police and failed to include details of a child's bruising and absence from school in a report. Another child that went missing was also not reported by Mr Dunn.
Council spokesman Jane Vine said: "Our systems have changed significantly since Mr Dunn was dismissed in late 2008.
"We have revolutionised the way we manage our recording system and introduced an electronic system, so it is not possible for a social worker to progress a case without using the system and if they don't do so it will be picked up quickly.
"The system was introduced in January 2008 and Mr Dunn was suspended in April 2008.
"We took immediate action to suspend him as soon as we became aware of the situation."
new conservative MP for Stafford lets hope he is better than Hugh Robertson , former Ann Widdecombe who are all conservative useless twats in Maidstone remember folks Helen Grant is also in the child snatching profession and Cameron couldnt give a shit
mobile 07977 937673
Jeremy Lefroy
MP for Stafford constituency
i hope to get a meeting with Andrew Griffiths our new conservative MP as well i also rang Ian Perry and left a message on his answer phone but hes not rang me back im still waiting hes just ignorant like the rest of SCC SSs
Kent are well known for child snatching so dont hold out much hope
day in and day out it breaks my heart every day as well not seeing my daughter donna marie gibson still im doing all that i can do at the moment but the SS are doing all that they can do to keep us apart just so they can stop us exposing them and getting the truth out which they dont want i know that shes 26 now but that does not matter to them they still dont want me and her to have anything to do with each other its always been the same the last time that i saw her was in 1986 for 2 minutes it was just because donna marie wanted to come to me but the bloody sw had upset her not me but i got the blame for it and she told me to sod off they never did like me seeing her and were jeaious the only reason that i got stopped from seeing her is because she loved to see me and wanted to see me everytime if i had been allowed to see her she would have been here now court order or not and the ss could not have done a thing about it weve had over 20 years of heartbreak and theres been no need at all for it even seen donna marie was kidnapped by the ss for being too happy loved and wanted but we will expose them when ive got hold of donna marie and told her the truth its all go to come out even the abortion have you seen that photo of donna marie on my facebook page which she sent me when she got in touch with me over three years ago now and i would have seen her by now if the ss had not poked their noses in when its not wanted we are still being fobbed off and lied to by them now just because i love and miss my daughter they think that its wrong
This is what our Government is and has been, and is still doing. Do we really want to continue with New Labour Social Engineering, human genome Policy of evil deceit? Child Trafficking, so that Civil Servants can justify their jobs and obscene salaries, at tax payers expense. they are stealing peoples children and destroying the family???
http://www.thisisplymouth.co.uk/news/Fostering-real-family-affair/article-2132762-detail/article.html
Fostering is a real family affair
FAMILY: Foster carers Tor and Rick Kennedy with two of their own children Paris, 13 and Trent, 12 and puppy Maycee
I WONDER HOW MANY WOULD FOSTER IF THEY TOOK AWAY THE MONEY
Linda Frances Mcdermott
Listen to this anyone can get ulcerative colitis . Dr Claire Sturge & Dr Anthony Wilkins said I did not have it and mislead the courts to believe I was a hypochondriac . I have histology and pathology and none of it was excepted in a closed family court.
Ulcerative Colitis Survival Story
www.youtube.com
News report by Laurabree Monday about Blake Weinberger & family. Battle with ulcerative colitis.
i have know a really good pal that worked for ss and seen that every ss thing done and said is all from the manager so the actual ss wasnt always the prob. but fact that the manager pulls the strings but doesnt see the people concerned is a big prob to me. and even worse is that some area only hire new qualified ss for cp and when you ask for a separate dept to deal they say no as they realise that they are wrong.
I understand that the social services are after Hollie Greig, worried about her welfare?
The SS will try and say that what has happened regarding the truth and the cover up is distressing to Hollie and try and take her off her Mum.
They have been evil to Robert Green, no MP signed the pledge.
Get a very bad feeling about Nick Clegg,his mother was from holland and he lived in holland for a long time/EU.
We all know the state of affairs in holland the peads rings.
what is he doing standing for the UK he is not english.
That why Nick Clegg is supporting the corrupt Karen Gillard and her Gay friends, the common purpose hidden agenda. This can not be good for the UK
voting forms corruption by Barry Keel, common purpose, chief ex, plymouth city council. Browean Lacey head of child protection, common purpose, social services, has no experience of child protection, how did she get the job.
the election was run by spin and media control, something was not right
Karen Gillard should be pulled up about her lies, she is not a barrister.She can not call her self a barrister, who is protecting her
http://networkedblogs.com/3Hxtn
NORTH YORKSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL KNOWINGLY BREECH FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT BY PROVIDING INACCURATE INFORMATION IN RESPONSE TO AN FOI ACT REQUEST
An FOI request was sent to NYCC in respect of a query relating to Dr Susan E. Bradbury Psychiatrist and her involvement in joint and single expert witness assessments in care proceedings
Just another load of lying shits who could tell the truth if you paid the; oh I forgot we do through our taxes which are also unlawful
http://news.scotsman.com/education/Parents-scared-to-let-son.6283493.jp
Parents scared to let son out after 'appalling' bruise probe
Published Date: 10 May 2010
By GEMMA FRASER
826 Lancashire children on 'at risk' register
www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk
THE recession and the Baby P case prompted a massive increase in the number of children on the ‘at risk’ register in Lancashire, it was revealed today.
Secret Courts and Forced Adoption in the UK - Brian Gerrish
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJB_7vajGV8
Are the judges child abusers – YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES
they all are even the ones who are not directly molesting children are allowing them to be stolen for MONEY
Dear Ms McDermott
Thank you for your enquiry.
The Legal Complaints Service deals with complaints about the service that solicitors in England or Wales provide to their clients. However, because solicitors are professionally obliged to try to resolve complaints, the Legal Complaints Service is unable to become involved until this procedure has been exhausted.
Solicitors in England and Wales are required to operate a complaints procedure and must take all reasonable steps to resolve any complaint about their service which has been put to them by their client. Your complaint should be made to the complaint’s handling partner of the firm.
To assist you in making the complaint, I enclose Resolution and Complaint forms together with an information booklet, which explains our function and the complaint process in more detail. Please complete the Resolution form and send the pink copy to your solicitor, retaining the blue and green copies.
Experience has proved that in the majority of instances once a solicitor is aware that their client is dissatisfied, they will do their utmost to resolve that complaint and I very much hope that that will be the situation with your complaint.
If your solicitor does not resolve your complaint to your satisfaction, you should contact this Office. Please provide us with the following:
a) an explanation of why you remain dissatisfied, using the enclosed Complaint Form
b) a copy of the Resolution Form
c) copies of the firm’s response to your complaint
d) any other correspondence relating to your complaint.
Please note that you may refer your complaint back to this Office within 6 months of your matter completing (termination of the retainer). Therefore, if the matter is currently ongoing you may wish to wait until its conclusion before referring the complaint back to us. If you do need to return to us please send is copies of all correspondence dealing with your complaint and explain to us why you remain unhappy.
If you have any further queries, you may wish to contact the Legal Complaints Helpline on 0845 6086565 and speak with one of our helpline agents. Our lines are open between 9 am and 5 pm Monday to Friday. Please note calls may be monitored/recorded for training purposes.
Yours sincerely
Duncan Allen
Customer Contact Centre
On behalf of the Email Enquiries Team
Duncan,
Thank you for your reply , but I will put it now in the public domain. Let the public decide if they would want these solicitors on their case. I am too busy for your suggestions they are a waste of time. May I suggest you go see the paperwork on the blog click on the link again more paperwork is going up.
Kind Regards
Linda McDermott
When a decent mother gets arrested for posting a birthday card to her son something is seriously amiss!! I don't like the bit that comments that the scandal of children being removed from parents for no good reason is kept under wraps because 'all three main parties have agreed not to discuss it' WHY ON EARTH NOT! that... surely is a scandel in itself is it not?
MAUREEN SPALEK IS GOOD MOTHER AND HER CHILDREN MUST BE RETURNED NOW
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/article_family_courts_jolly_good#incoming-84352
Article - Family Courts 'jolly good fun' ? invite to Lord Justice Wall
2 May 2010
Dear Dear Lord Justice Wall - President of the High Court Family
Division
Having forwarded a copy of the following email. I would like to
know if judges are paid for their contributions or if this is done
on a voluntary basis. If paid please provide the sums involved
encompassing all judges and records held.
I would also like to invite you and/or others to attend any of the
‘Child snatching by the State’ events that will be occurring
throughout the country. You are most welcome to put forward the
stance from the family courts perspective and will meet many
families with ‘first-hand knowledge of children’s social services
and the family courts’ who have shown great courage in adversity,
yet still show compassion and understanding for others, safe in
their knowledge that through love there is no separation.
I hope you will forgive this invitation being placed in the public
domain, but feel it is within the best interests of honesty
openness & transparency, in keeping with the justice system fully
engaging with families whose decisions affect so many children &
families lives.
Article - Family Courts 'jolly good fun' ?
Dear Judge Isobel Plumstead
I am absolutely disgusted to read the following article sent to me
by distraught parents who have had their children stolen by social
services in secret closed family courts; having attended the recent
‘Child snatching by the state’ conference in Stafford.
http://www.bemyparent.org.uk/features/it...
I have no reason to doubt these parents & grandparents accounts/
experiences of social services and the family courts, having
resigned from the Conservative party due to Conservative Kent
County Council taking my own offspring of 4 young granddaughters
for the exact same fate.
Many like myself bitterly regret seeking the advice & assistance of
social services and believe they should come with a government
'health warning'
Could it be that I was hoping to raise the exact same concerns,
encompassing the lack of support for families by social services
and transparency & accountability within the system?
Forgive me for not finding it ‘ jolly good fun’ to be removed from
the court (without my consent) and my granddaughter’s lives
forever, through fear of social services canvassing for my own
young children. Having been lucky enough to be advised against
being bullied into‘ psychological testing’ by a gentleman who also
attended the conference called Ian Josephs an Ex Kent County
Councillor (Conservative)
You may find his website of interest
http://www.forced-adoption.com/introduct...
Nor do I believe the children will find it ‘ jolly good fun’ when
they realise as adults what has happened to them; many have been
abused within the ‘care’ system and separated from their siblings,
to then be given to strangers rather than blood kin, who dearly
love & care for them.
What I am certain of, is that they will want to know who is
ultimately responsible.
regards
Cllr Sheena Williams ( Independent – Maidstone Borough Councillor)
Judges are NOT on their Oaths (EVEN IN PRACTICE) between 86% - 95% per YEAR. On the basis that - IN THEORY - they are only ever on their Oaths for the 15 - 50 days (which they are NOT, anyway ... as we know)
I DON'T wish to avoid "Court Action". Because it could lead to something like this (me in italics):
"Who are you?"
"I am Judge So-and So"
"Is that your full title?"
"I am (Deputy) District Judge So-and so ... if it is any business of yours"
"Yes, it IS my business, because I have the RIGHT to know who sits in judgment of me. According to HMCS you are therefore employed as a (Deputy) District Judge for between 15 and 50 days per year. That means that - for anywhere between 86% and 95% of the time you are NOT a Judge in any way, shape or form. What I want to know is ... ARE YOU A JUDGE AT THIS MOMENT IN TIME? ARE YOU ON YOUR OATH AT THIS MOMENT IN TIME ... for the simple reason that - if you are NOT - then you are NOT a Judge. If you ARE, then you have only one job, which is to either move this case to a Court with a Jury ... or to dismiss it due to lack of prima facie evidence. AND YOU KNOW THAT, OF COURSE. In neither case are you entitled to make Orders, so why are we here?"
Of course you can always put them on their oath !!!
http://ukstolenchildren.com/
Yvonne Stewart-Taylor
They attempted to steal my granddaughter for forced adoption too. I served for 17 years on Windermere Town Council, Local Authority School Governor, Registered Child Minder, Adult Ed tutor/Lecturer. They do not like anyone who fights for justice, because they are corrupt evil and have no integrity. Only an evil person would steal a womans children. it is barbaric and base. Anyone could be their next victim, you do not have to do anything wrong. We are being governed and taxed by criminals. The system that allows all this to happen is both corrupt and deplorable. When the children are away from their families the abuse starts. I have a friend who was raped every day by her foster father at age 13, when his wife had left to go to work. I have two cousins who were sexually abused, and raped in foster care.
Paedophiles are everywhere, in all the professions, and it all gets covered up.
Any responsible and decent parent/grandparent, armed with all this knowledge, would fight to the death to protect their innocent children.
They had better not try this with me and mine again. I would serve time rather than let them abuse my children. Read Teresa Coopers book, Trust no One.
Letter via email to KATHRYN MCGOVERN, NOTTINGHAM CITY COUNCIL SOCIAL WORKER
Ms. McGovern,
To reiterate the sentiments of my wife, what you have done is beyond the pale. YOU are, in my eyes, responsible for the psychiatric assault on my sons as evidenced by Benjamin’s emotional state on the 30th April, and YOU WILL be held personally responsible for ANY FURTHER HARM that comes to them. As it is, an OFFICIAL COMPLAINT is being drafted for the attention of the Director of Nottingham City Council, to the GSCC, and I hereby give notice that you are being included on an indictment with several other individuals which is to be filed at the Royal Courts of Justice by myself, personally, in eight days, along with a motion to strike the Permanent Custody Order and call for public criminal investigation into your entire department.
http://www.lyndamac.com/?p=5891
“THE FINDING OF FACT STAGE.”
Some people are under the impression of ”THE FINDING OF FACT FINDING” is for the Local Authority to find this. This is not true ,sometimes your solicitor will do this ,however if your counsel(Coram based Barristers) tries to put you under pressure to admit the threshold for emotional harm simple say “NO” as once you have admitted to the threshold criteria,by the way you may be interested to know that there is none. After you admit this ,there is no way back for you or any realistic idea of any appeal in the future.
This is child’s play for solicitors,courts & social workers . Naive families walk straight into all of this thinking these are ordinary court proceedings and the truth will come out reason will be given and chances given to families to have a fair trial. Forgive me for saying ,it is just like taking candy from a baby and mark my words “they do take your baby”
Only this time you are being fed false hope,right up until the final hearing it will not be clear until it is far to late, that you like thousands of other families who have gone before you have also been set up too.
There is no point of any return when you take this bad legal advice .
http://www.badenochandclark.com/files/file/Claire-Garnham-Children-Update.pdf
Thanks to A for sharing this link .This is what they use for finding of fact or threshold criteria ……..
So please do not make this same fatal mistake that I made. That will result in no right of appeal just like me and you do not want to be like me no contact worth having. There are only about 4 cases of appeal a year anyway .It is very rare that families get an appeal.
Yes that is right, there is no criteria they make it up as they literally go along . There is no right of appeal.
Lastly I want to apologize to all the hard working taxpayer who paid my bill for me to lose my case. It seems you need legal advice long before you pick up a phone for solicitors. There is a link to name and shame solicitors who are in the back pocket of the Local Authority.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/oxfordshire/8672584.stm
Appeal in Oxford adoption parents' photo case
Oxfordshire County Council has gone to court to stop the parents of a child given up for adoption receiving an annual picture of the toddler.
Oxfordshire County Council said it could not agree with the request because it might allow the parents, from Oxford, to track down the girl.
It said it had agreed to show them a photo, but not to allow them keep it.
Last year, a judge at Oxford County Court ruled the parents should still receive an annual report and picture.
'Little risk'
The county council challenged the decision at the Court of Appeal.
Its lawyers argued the photograph would allow the parents to use the internet to find their daughter.
The county council had already agreed to show the parents a photograph of the girl every year, but not to let them keep it.
Lawyers acting for the parents said the pair had made no attempt to trace their daughter and there was little risk of tracking her down using a photograph.
The judge at Oxford County Court said the girl had a right to know that her natural parents still cared for her.
The case was being heard by the Master of the Rolls, Lord Neuberger, as well as Lord Justice Moses and Lord Justice Munby.
The judges reserved their decision.
Grandmother wins Kent County Council foster care ruling
High Court (generic)
The ruling, revealed on Monday, was made in the High Court
A grandmother has won the legal right to be paid as a foster carer for looking after her granddaughter.
The woman, 64, referred to as "GM", took over caring for the 15-year-old, referred to as "A", at Kent County Council (KCC) social services' request.
KCC had refused to pay her the same rate as a foster carer even though the child would have been taken into care in 2004 had she not stepped in. The High Court ruled KCC must pay GM £146 per week instead of £63.
The grandmother will now receive the same payments that a foster carer with no family connections would.
Because the case is being seen as having widespread implications, the judge, Mrs Justice Black, gave the council permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal.
Violent relationships
Family lawyers have described the ruling, revealed for the first time on Monday, as a landmark decision.
The judge said that A had been living with GM, now retired, since December 2004 and would have gone into foster care if her grandmother had not intervened.
Her parents had been assessed as "clearly unable to care for her". A's mother - GM's daughter - had suffered mental problems and been involved in a number of violent relationships, including with A's father. There was little doubt that A's experience of living with her parents, prior to December 2004, had been harmful to her, the judge said.
The judge said in future the county council must treat A as "looked-after" by the authority "in terms of financial and other resources".
Kent County Hall
Kent County Council, which placed A with her grandmother, is to appea
Because of an unexplained delay in the case coming to court, the extra £80 a week will only be paid from 2 March last year. Nigel Priestley, of Huddersfield law firm Ridley & Hall, which represented the grandmother, said he was delighted with the court's ruling.
"It has implications for many children Kent has placed with relatives," he said. "Many carers will be losing out."
He said he was disappointed that KCC wanted to appeal.
"Sadly it shows just how little they value the relatives who are making enormous sacrifices for their grandchildren."
'Burst into tears'
Mr Priestley, a trustee of the Family Rights Group, said "kinship" carers were increasingly being used because of a shortage of foster carers.
"They shouldn't have to find themselves battling with the local authority for support," he said.
GM said: "I put myself out and expected the local authority to do the same but they did not.
"When I heard that I had won I burst into tears. It means so much both to me and my granddaughter. Teenagers are very expensive to bring up - every parent knows that."
A spokesman for KCC said it could not comment until its appeal had been resolved.
This exactly what councillor Sheena Williams tried to bring about when she looked after her granddaughters KCC lied bared faced and pretend on the second occasion that they were assessing her as a foster carer.
Kent County Council are corrupt and would rather steal the children than let grandparents care form them so they dont have to bother supporting the family , yet spend thousands on foster carers who abuse the children
they should hang their heads in shame
Nigel Priestly is the same solicitor who was supporting Sheena to bring a conviction against Kent when she was caring for her granddaughter with no support from KCC
but then did NOTHING when they stole them for forced adoption because she didnt have the MONEY to pay him
all that glitters is NOT GOLD
http://soundcloud.com/tony-rodgers
Bill Maloney Tony Rodgers, Manchester, Britain (UK) talking out about the abuse of children Hollie Greig & forced adoption
Well done Bill
we need juries in the family court
ADDENDUM TO STATEMENT BEFORE THE COURT
Equality of arms is a key component of the Article 6 ECHR rights of the litigant, and any proposals that would seek to limit or control free choice, especially in care proceedings, would run the clear risk of being Article 6-non-compliant.
The human rights of parents or family members will in many cases lead a Court to consider further or additional assessment - particularly where the draconian step of a child’s removal to adoption is at issue, where assessment beyond the core assessment is required, and where second opinion expert evidence is necessary.
The instruction and identification of appropriate experts is critical in many cases for many families.. If the wrong expert or an inexperienced or poor quality expert is involved, this can delay proceedings, resulting in higher costs and risks poor decision-making.
It is difficult to see how a level of confidence could be maintained by any move which led to assessment being undertaken as a matter of routine by a standard team of people who lack individualism.
The Commission would need to take into account any views and considerations expressed by the Court when looking at the suitability or otherwise of a particular assessment involved. There can be many situations in family cases which to the particular individual family involved will seem exceptional. Therefore the Legal Services Commission and the Ministry would need to be aware that there are many cases which would quite properly justify exceeding the proposed hourly rates. Clearly the more specialist the assessment and the more limited the availability of an expert in the particular field needed, the more likely it is that the hourly rate will exceed the proposed rates.
http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/local-national/sacked-social-worker-loses-legal-challenge-14804147.html
Sacked social worker loses legal challenge
Tuesday, 11 May 2010
A social worker who was sacked over unproven allegations that he was part of a paedophile ring has lost a legal challenge over the way police handled his case.
The man was contesting a ruling that the PSNI owed him no duty of care when informing his bosses at a children's home in Londonderry that he was not regarded as fit to continue in the role.
Judges in the Court of Appeal in Belfast upheld the decision after finding no evidence of negligence by the police. The man, who has not been named, worked at Nazareth House Children's Home during the 1980s and 1990s.
He was suspended in 1996 when a sexual allegation was made against him by a former resident.
Following an investigation he was reinstated and informed by the Director of Public Prosecutions that no further action was being taken.
But a year later, two children — one aged five, the other 14 years of age — identified him as being part of a ring of up to 50 adults involved in child sex abuse in the north west.
Inquiries were carried out on both sides of the border before it was again decided to take no further action.
An acting assistant chief constable replied that RUC and Garda investigations led to a direction of no prosecution.
After the man was dismissed in 1999 industrial tribunal proceedings resulted in a £5,000 payment being made to him
LSC AND CARTER BROWN ASSOCIATES CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
Carter Brown Associates are pleased to introduce their new ‘multidisciplinary team expert witness approach' through the LSC Pilot.
The Pilot has come into force following the Chief Medical Officer's report "Bearing Good Witness: reforming the delivery of medical expert evidence in family law cases. The Pilot project will see the provision of multi-disciplinary expert witness teams to family courts in Public Law Childcare Proceedings.
Contracts will shortly be signed with the LSC and the Pilot will commence on 1st April 2009. Carter Brown Associates will be covering Pilot cases in Nottinghamshire, Derbyshire, Lincolnshire, Leicestershire and Sheffield.
Please note that the Pilot scheme is only for cases where there is to be a joint instruction of experts. This will not affect the way in which Carter Brown Associates operate in the instruction of single expert witnesses.
How the Pilot will benefit you: -
The LSC will pay Carter Brown Associates direct for the work undertaken. You will not therefore have to seek prior authority for the experts work and there will be no need to submit evidence of obtaining more than one quote for the work.
Although two or more experts will be involved you will have a document that will form part of the report which will outline areas of agreement/disagreement between the experts. Hopefully this will obviate the need for experts meetings.
How the process will work: -
When making a referral, please call our Referrals Department in the usual way on 01623 641567 or refer online through our website.
Please indicate which experts you will require, either specifically by name, or by profession, e.g. we will require the joint instruction of a Psychologist and a Psychiatrist on this case; we require a Social Worker and Child Psychologist; a Forensic Psychologist and child and adolescent psychiatrist etc.
CV's, timescales and costs will be provided to you in the usual way.
Carter Brown Associates will coordinate the ‘expert witness team' from the point of receipt of instructions through to the provision of their joint report. This will include the management of joint experts meetings during the case to establish the conclusions of the final report.
The Court Order will need to appoint Carter Brown Associates for the provision of the joint expert witness report. However you will still have the choice of experts as is currently the case.
CBA complicit in perverting the course of justice? Say it ain't so! :x
CBA taking money from the LSC to supply "expert" witnesses introduces an immediate conflict of interests as far as they are now reliant on the FPC continuing to exist as is for them to continue existing, PERIOD.
Therefore, there is absolutely NO incentive whatsoever for their agents to make reports favouring the parents in care proceedings. I HAVE DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE OF THIS DATING FROM SEPTEMBER 2008!
http://networkedblogs.com/3IZMs
May 9, 2010
Untrained police interviewers
‘allow sex offenders to go free’
Victims of child sex abuse may not be getting justice as the poor quality of police interviews allows perpetrators to go free, a report has warned.
The study found most police interviewers had only a week’s training to deal with children in abuse cases. Some 78% of staff surveyed said they had no refresher training and 60% said they got no feedback on how they conducted their interviews.
The study, for the Scottish Institute for Policing Research, also found that 87% of interviewers were not following Scottish government guidelines.
Few conducted “practice interviews”, which are designed to put children at ease by discussing neutral issues before asking them about the alleged crime.
The report also noted failures to ask open-ended questions to elicit more detailed and accurate responses from children.
The authors, who spoke to 91 police interviewers, said the study “identified important concerns about the quality of interviewing in Scotland” and that crucial evidence could be lost as a result.
“Our findings suggest situations may be occurring where a child has been abused but they are interviewed poorly, meaning the quality of the evidence isn’t good,” said David La Rooy, a psychologist at Abertay university and the study’s lead author. He has shared the results of his research with police forces, and officers are now taking his courses to develop their interviewing skills.
He said it was difficult for management to assess the quality of interviewing techniques as there is no legal requirement to film interviews with children in Scotland.
Mark O’Donnell, a social worker who co-ordinates joint investigative interview training in the west of Scotland, said: “It is clear that workers need post-training support and regular refreshing to maintain appropriate levels of skill and knowledge. A refresher course has been piloted and is being rolled out to all police divisions and local authorities.”
Detective superintendent Lesley Boal, who leads the child protection working group for the Association of Chief Police Officers in Scotland, said: “Carrying out joint investigative interviews is a highly skilled task, which requires advanced training to ensure that interviewers have the appropriate knowledge and practice to carry out effective interviews.
“As with any training course, we recognise the importance of continuous improvement and regular reviews are carried out.”
Letter to GRAHAM NEIL of VHS FLETCHER’S SOLICITORS
Graham,
Further to your knuckle dragging, slothsome manner in which you have been dealing with our instructions, you are hereby instructed that if you do not DO YOUR JOB FOR WHICH YOU HAVE TAKEN PUBLIC FUNDS, you will be reported to the Law Society for criminal malpractice and fraud.
FILE FOR DISCHARGE OF THE CARE ORDER ON THE GROUNDS OF EMOTIONAL HARM BY CLOSE OF BUSINESS WEDNESDAY, OR THE OFFICIAL COMPLAINT GOES IN FIRST POST THURSDAY.
http://www.lyndamac.com/?p=5953
What is it going to cost to have contact after school which is a 3 minute walk away from our home? It will cost Yvonne Crawford ex -social worker or Purple Professionals how much an hour ? £25 – £50 an hour……..
This comes out of local government ,just how many contact centres need to be filled, and how much a year do they make ?
Well it is only the taxpayers money and my child we are paying for this with so it does not matter. This is about making money not child protection.
My final statement is very close at hand , for those that have seen it already the Luton Social Services have yet to say what it is I am a risk to my son of .If I have un-supervised contact.
Cardolyn Hill is not even a social worker either and she is recommending that I stay long term in a contact centre to see my son.
The DO’s & Don’ts life is not long enough to contemplate those and my sanity is worth so much more and the welfare of my son is worth so much more.
I would rather no relationship with my son than supervised bullying at £25 – £50 an hour. My message to my son is you are better off playing with your friends outside than being exposed to this
Judge Richard Polden was far more concerned that it would upset the fostercarers to be required to visit the maternal grandparents house with the children
" they might not want to"
in the case of grandmother councillor Sheena Williams CRB checked and a director of the YMCA and herself a corporate parent
What planet are these judges on they should all be sacked immediately nor retired off as some would wish with a great big fat pay-off
How much with Martin Narey be paid to retire ?
another sicko attached to child molesters who should never have been put in a position of power over children
carrying on exposing these nonces Bill
And its not just the Church who are doing this, But also the Irish government and other governments as well
The idea was to attack the church in Ireland and keep attacking it never letting up, Thats the only way change comes, Its hard because at times it like battering your head against a brick wall, We can use this to attack all Catholic mps in europe who support some one who lives in the Vatican who covered up the rape of children in the USA
IMPORTANT
They are taking parents into equity court (secret family courts) and stealing your children under trust , by transferring the title to the children
http://www.filestube.com/282245972fe8c74303ea,g/2010-01-26-Money-Banking-and-Trusts-NTT-as-New-Trust-Technology-Consise-Explaination-of-NTT-as-a-Remedy.html
Cameron is related to Harriet Harman, the new leader of the Labour Party, as well as to The Queen. Nothing like keeping it in the family, is there?
Nothing will change for parents and more children will be stolen because we have evil operating and in control no matter what puppet they put in place.
UK - David Cameron is UK's new prime minister
news.bbc.co.uk
FFS One arsehole for another. Good family values, best he exersice them rather quick.
difficult to have good family values when ss undermine them and difficult to have good family unit when ss ship your children off to live miles away from the parent!!!
disband crapcass disband ss and disband secretive family courts now that would be change for the better
And I hope he will make sure that the scottish paedophiles are put into prison for abusing Hollie Greig and murdering her uncle
Transcript from audio capture of yesterday’s aborted LAC review
I arrived at 1402, sat waiting for 17 minutes with the deputy head from Welbeck School. No exchange was offered nor entered into between the two of us.
KEY:
CM=Kathryn McGovern
JM=me
DH=Deputy Head
CM: Hiya. The meeting’s been cancelled.[unintelligible] corresponded with Melizza yesterday.
JM: I have email as well.
CM: Right.
JM: And it’s on record.
CM: [unintelligible]
JM: I’m not privy to her email. That’s her own private business. But, since you’re here and in case you missed the email that I sent to you yesterday, and it is also in the public domain; next week, I’m filing 137 lawsuits at the High Court in London. Your name is in those lawsuits.
CM: Mkay.
DH: When is the new date?
CM: 17th.
JM: I shall be attending with a legal advocate.
DH: 17th May.
CM: Yep. 2pm.
DH: Why was it cancelled then?
CM: [unintelligible]
DH: and is it here?
CM: yep. What’s happened is that the reviewing officers have got a lot off sick…[unintelligible]
JM: That wouldn’t be down to mental health problems, would it, by any chance?
CM: [unintelligible] I’m really sorry, everybody should have been informed. [unintelligible]
JM: well, as I said, my email is on record.
CM: so you want contacting seperately then?
JM: Yes, and as far as we’re concerned, in person you treat us as one.
CM: so in person…
JM: in person you treat us as one. As far as email’s concerned, sent the correspondence to seperate accounts.
[DOOR SHUTS, MEETING OVER].
As to the unintelligible, she did allude to the claim that she sent out the cancellations last Friday. Funny that, I didn’t get one.
I have the original audio in case it’s needed. This is for my own lawful safety, I was expecting a knock on the door from some friendly corporate enforcement officers this morning…
Yvonnes Story - UK Social Services Tried to Take my Granddaughter - A Families Hell
http://www.no2abuse.com/index.php/articles/comments/yvonnes-story-social-services-tried-to-take-my-granddaughter-a-families-hel/
Our story, what Social Services did to us. Now we are persecuted by local police 7 years later!!
http://worldreports.org/news/282_all_uk_legislation_passed_since_2000_is_null_and_void
ALL UK LEGISLATION PASSED SINCE 2000 IS NULL AND VOID
IMPLICATIONS OF MISMANAGEMENT OF 'REFORM' OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS
The nation will have to be told that TEN YEARS’ WORTH OF LAWS don’t exist in reality, only on paper, and that all legislation since 2000 is NULL AND VOID.
Cabbage Patch / Dutch Aliance UK Dread!!
http://thesecretpeople.wordpress.com/2010/05/03/criminal-justice-system-beats-a-retreat-in-the-face-of-truth/
Criminal Justice System Beats a Retreat in the Face of Truth!
Neil Jones I finally get JUSTICE!
Now to continue my attempt to expose the truth, in order to get two totally innocent former MI6 pilots released from jail, where they have both already served eight and a half years of a life sentence, which they were sentenced to, in order to suppress damning information which they were unfortunate to be privy to; Information which this government do not want YOU the British public to know about!
Sir Mark Potter ex president of the family courts should be ashamed of himself for letting Christine Payne cafcass guardian and her solicitor Gwen Williams off with a tiny fine after they were convicted of contempt of court. He was also witnessed my many practicing law from the bench in the royal courts of justice or is it JUST US !
Why are these two evil women still being allowed to operate after conviction and obtaining a criminal record ?
clause 61 Magna Carta states that a citizen or subject may peacefully disobey unjust Laws or Statutes.
besides that, the public at large DO NEED TO KNOW!
"Publicity is the very soul of Justice." - Munby J [2009] EWHC 1663 (Fam)
Worth bearing in mind that CBA has a vested interest in siding with the LAs for them to be able to keep their first-refusal retainer on any and all ISW and psych assessments in family proceedings. That you are aware of this hence object in the strongest possible terms to even being approached by CBA for assessment as you know for a demonstrable fact, that any report coming from them will look unfavourably on you.
CBA are in Crapcass and LA's pockets, they just parrot everything said by them all. Get a full copy of the Crapcass files too, that way you have concrete proof of the sol acting alone without instruction. They are the child's sol anyway and should be acting according to the children's wishes, any devience from this then they must be sacked with form N434 and the children must instruct their own representation.
christine payne of cafcass archway
Gwen Williams
Partner
Gwen worked in Africa on a management programme for the Crown Agents before qualifying as a solicitor in 1994. She joined Goodman Ray in June 2001 where, as a family lawyer, she operates in all aspects of the law relating to children. She is frequently called upon where applications for Care Orders are made by local authorities, and where there are disputes between parents concerning contact and residence which can be exploited.
She is a member of Association of Lawyers for
Children (ALC) and the Law Society's Children Panel and is recognised for her considerable experience on management committees abusing various domestic violence and voluntary sector groups.
http://thelostpacket.wordpress.com/2010/04/12/review-child-snatching-by-the-state-conference-stafford-10-april/
Child snatching by the state conference uncut, a preview
Here’s the series of ultra-lo-fi versions. Please don’t expect too much from these!
Child Snatching By The State, Part 1 Size: 16.15MB, duration approx.: 44min
Child Snatching By The State, Part 2 Size: 16.15MB, duration approx.: 44min
Child Snatching By The State, Part 3 Size: 16.15MB, duration approx.: 44min
Child Snatching By The State, Part 4 Size: 16.17MB, duration approx.: 44min
Child Snatching By The State, Part 5 Size: 16.18MB, duration approx.: 44min
Child Snatching By The State, Part 6 Size: 16.17MB, duration approx.: 44min
Child Snatching By The State, Part 7 Size: 10.89MB, duration approx.: 30min
Freedom Advocacy & Law
http://www.freedom-advocacy-law.co.uk/contact_us.html
Sam E Hallimond - Senior Practicing Partner
Los Montesinos, Spain.
Tel: +34 966 721 056
Mob: +34 634 310 778
Email: samhallimond@freedomlaw.es
samhallimond@freedom-advocacy-law.co.uk
James R Moore - Senior Practicing Partner
Nottingham, England.
Tel: +44 (0) 7518 842885
Email: james.moore@freedomlaw.co.uk
james.moore@freedom-advocacy-law.co.uk
Well done , go get them !
FOR 'the rampant FRAUD & CORRUPTION' that abounds in most allegedly 'civilised states', access the exclusive page:
http://www.uk-human-rights.org/confraud.htm
For PROOF of the collaboration, between the Executive & the Administrative, in such states / the UK, read below the explicit arrangements for 'the serfs':
"The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an ACTION which MUST FAIL; as for instance, an action brought in respect of an act of State."
The above qualify: 'Criminals are in control in pseudo-democratic states'.
Don’t be a Hater.
Social workers aren’t trained to be cold and unfeeling, yet that’s exactly what they are.
The fact is that they were never shown love as children therefore they think that it’s abnormal and wrong for anyone to show affection for anyone else.
Just the sort of fodder for building SS robots.
The psychosis harvested after years of sowing hatred, rejection, emotional neglect and no hugs carries through adulthood in these baby snatchers.
They show no emotion because they are incapable of it.
They show no love or affection because they are afraid of it.
Don’t hate them for what they are, pity them for what they have become.
They want you to hate them, that’s their “justification” for what they do.
They can’t stand pity because that’s an emotion and they don’t know how to handle it.
Just to let all you know that the family court in Plymouth, and the likes of cafcass and social services are nothing but jokers!!!! But the time has come and the table has turned, now it's time to have some fun my way!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Watch this space!!!! Ride together Die together BB4L! Polly Baynes and Thom Ritchie - I'm coming for ya! Colin Wight your definitely gonna be my first experiment!!
The Law of Nature says that not all can be parents and for good reason
You don’t see animals nicking others babies because they are barren
Shame all all these and the child snatchers who feed their fantasies of becoming pretendy parents , they never can or will be the children are not of their blood
Kirsty Seddon
I will see tomorrow, if the tables have turned for me, Once they have turned ss will not be able to turn them back over as I will have the upper hand and have all the evidence I need whilst they have none, just hear say and predictions. Maybe I should ask them if I can borrow their crystal ball lol.
Fay Williams
Just to let all you know that the family court in Plymouth, and the likes of cafcass and social services are nothing but jokers!!!! But the time has come and the table has turned, now it's time to have some fun my way!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Watch this space!!!!
childrens minister
shamimkhaliq@hotmail.com
16/05/10
Re: Failing Child Protection Services
Dear SARAH TEATHER MP, NEW CHILDREN'S MINISTER,
I am writing to highlight ground level corruption in children's services and to argue that family-support would be far more successful than child protection in reducing child abuse and neglect. I urge you to talk to MPs Tim Yeo and John Hemming who are already aware of this.
Professionals with an area of expertise that measure directly are far better judges of risk to children than SS who focus on the negative (http://www.parental-alienation.info/publications/14-recresintrisassofchi.htm). In fact, direct observation of 90 minutes a day over 3 days can help determine if a child is abused or neglected (http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/abn/93/1/106/). Instead, once an allegation of child abuse is made, social workers begin with an assumption that the abuse has occurred and their investigations are skewed toward providing evidence to support the allegation and not to take an impartial, even-handed or open-minded approach. evidence which can exonerate parents is often disregarded, ignored or withheld, or in some instances the evidence against them is distorted, embellished and fabricated (Prosser and Lewis, 1992; 1995). evidence is often faulty due to biased or dishonest reporting or errors in communication and SS are slow to revise their judgements despite a mounting body of evidence against them. SWs rely heavily on faulty intuitive skills; SWs' first impression of a family has enduring impact and parents' reactions to professionals during the investigation are taken as representative of the quality of parenting normally available to the child. SS are sceptical about information when it conflicts with their view of the family but are uncritical when the new evidence supports their view. children’s testimony is accepted when it corroborates the social worker’s assessment and doubted when it challenges it. Evidence from members of the public is completely ignored and written evidence is repeatedly overlooked in preference for direct reports from those present. SWs have a poor understanding of statistical risk factors. (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/358/1/Common_errors_of_reasoning_1999.pdf).
The basic principle of the case management approach (which first arose in the USA as a solution to the difficulties of providing community care) is that a case manager takes responsibility for a client; arranges an assessment of need, a comprehensive service plan, delivery of suitable services, and monitoring and assessment of services delivered. recent legislation has made case-management the cornerstone of community care in the UK. However, outcomes for clients helped by social services are no better after being managed in this way than not receiving any help at all (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6T1B-49J8HTB-J4&_user=10&_coverDate=02%2F18%2F1995&_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_searchStrId=1326794613&_rerunOrigin=scholar.google&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=dfd0c1b325991c1150ce5eaf03ca50cc). children's services initial assessment has systemic weaknesses so fails to increase safety (http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/40/2/352). there's little consistency in the manner that children in need are assessed or services provided (turnstill & aldgate, 2000). 20% of child protection investigations lead to the child being put on the child protection register, 5% to care. many parents go through investigation without receiving a service.
the story of children being taken away from good parents and then abused in state care (http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=42559&id=100000785197833&ref=share), where abuse is covered up, and children's services monitoring as abused children are slowly killed by their parents, is common to the US, UK, Australia and Canada... (http://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=Oy5gBzqEHP0C&oi=fnd&pg=PR6&dq=children%27s+services+uk&ots=NTrDJeiPMr&sig=KW1kib4kbQg2c0_dY1lbaasrN50#v=onepage&q=children%27s%20services%20uk&f=false). there are 2 child-care systems: 1) nordic countries' expensive "maximum public responsibility" one (sweden, finland, denmark) 2) hands-off "maximum private responsibility" british and american.
Australia is lumped with the UK and US as being "major laggards" (Kamerman & Kahn, 1991, pg 201). america and britain are high risk areas where children's needs and rights are ignored (moss et al., 1999, pg 25-26). in the UK, it is believed that the state should not encourage dependency by offering support to families (pg 19, http://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=RJDb1JddG0sC&oi=fnd&pg=PA8&dq=children%27s+services+uk&ots=Rtr-FnB_e7&sig=tvKBjzOGfvzeLOwTdmg9Jr0gC4Y#v=onepage&q=children%27s%20services%20uk&f=false). in britain, child-care services cater to less than 1% of the age-group, only children from deprived or inadequate backgrounds (moss, 1982; cohen, 1993). australia saw many feminists in bureaucracy inspired by feminism when developing policies (Sawer, 1990; eisenstein, 1990, pg 89; watson, 1990, pg3-4). non-profit organisations provide child-care services in Australia with subsidies from the government so there is affordable child-care for all. there is a variation between countries and within countries. in the US judges have more power so decide on the basis of their own personal prejudices, e.g. against men. in the UK, this behaviour is only common in ground level children's workers and judges just rubber-stamp their decisions.
denmark and finland have more child-care services than sweden, but in sweden, child-care services are embedded in parent-friendly policies regarding leave for sick children and to go to school events and reduced working hours... historically, sweden preferred to train and employ women more than immigrants (ruggie, 1984, pg 249; jonung & thordarsson, 1980, pg 109) so there was no second wave of feminism in this country. the swedish system provides more universally and protects children's rights more (moss et al., 1999, pg 37; dahlberg, 1997, pg22).
france is inbetween, feeling the job of the state is to create all equal (moss et al., 1999, pg 13).
children's services are removing kids from good parents and leaving kids with bad by not investigating and relying on hearsay and first impressions instead. having decided on the basis of conventionality that a parent poses a risk, they look to manufacture evidence that they fall into the following red-flagged categories (http://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=4BJRD9HfBRYC&oi=fnd&pg=PR10&dq=children%27s+services+uk&ots=l5Tsg1x5iv&sig=jF7WYE719T8o8ySDxZ3D_3Van54#v=onepage&q=children%27s%20services%20uk&f=false): poverty (hughes et al., 1960; taylor et al., 2000; jack, 2001; rose, 2001; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14576893), men (though as they cannot say it is because they are a man, they look for un-investigated claims of aggression against the men instead) (emery at al., 1982; rutter, 1982), single parents (Rutter & Quinton, 1984; http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/2155/1/download.pdf), large family size (Rutter & Quinton, 1984), mentally ill (children's services psychologists find anyone who is not self-actualised to have a mental illness) (orvachel, 1980; goodman & brumley, 1990; applebey & dickens, 1993), divorced parents or childhood abuse (d'orban, 1979), problems with dependency/care (childhood experiences of abandonment, neglect or rejection) or control/authority (inappropriate limit-setting or helplessness in the face of abuse) (reder & duncan, 1999), criminality (d'orban, 1979); poor parenting practices (kuperman et al., 1999; kendler, 2001; plomin et al., 2001; caspi et al., 2002; moffitt, 2002), infants under 2 years of age (durfee & tilton-durfee, 1995), people who are ill (don't put your kids in care temporarily because you won't get them back) (caring for a parent or taking on parental responsibility can leave you with needy love, pg 71 & 72, http://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=4BJRD9HfBRYC&oi=fnd&pg=PR10&dq=children%27s+services+uk&ots=l5Tsg1x5iv&sig=jF7WYE719T8o8ySDxZ3D_3Van54#v=onepage&q=children%27s%20services%20uk&f=false), parents who've suffered domestic violence (Rutter & Quinton, 1984; harnish et al., 1995; frick et al., 1992; davies & windle, 1997), depressed (even when the treatment works, http://bjp.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/full/191/5/378) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infanticide; beardslee et al., 1998; nomura et al., 2002; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15070641; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15351773), disabled (they do not provide effective assistance or services as in clarke et al., 2001) (o'connor et al., 1998), those who have been in care (Rutter & Quinton, 1984) or have a child in care, addicts (opiate or methadone: moss et al., 1995; nunes et al., 1998; pollock et al., 1990; weisman et al., 1999a), the non-resident parent almost always loses their case, if one child is injured or dies through no fault of the parent the parent loses all the children for not assessing risk, which is also the reason given why extended family lose adoption rights if they have supported the parent found wanting. they ignore evidence from the public completely and even ignore counter-evidence from professionals or the opinion of the child. SWs are more concerned with making a defensible decision than a right one (pg xix http://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=nBLClXPed08C&oi=fnd&pg=PR13&dq=children%27s+services+uk&ots=S28mJiGNXs&sig=td4sNAIOYUPZZAUasoaFJmxqJwc#v=onepage&q=children%27s%20services%20uk&f=false)
the children's courts, where parents never wi
(http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=42691&id=100000785197833&ref=share; http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/percentage_of_care_orders_indepe), are even more corrupt; parents have no say, non-children's services professionals are not invited to contradict slander and written testimonies from them are ignored, allowing hearsay which is slanted against the defendant, children's services are not prosecuted for perjury (http://www.parentsagainstinjustice.org.uk/index_files/Page567.htm), and parents are gagged afterwards so the miscarriage of justice cannot be made public (http://www.justice-for-families.org.uk/). Infants are preferred for removal from their family and adoption (http://www.statistics.gov.uk/STATBASE/xsdataset.asp?vlnk=562&More=Y; http://www.statistics.gov.uk/STATBASE/xsdataset.asp?vlnk=565&More=Y) and adopted children lose their extended family forever, and government has adoption targets to meet and makes money through this system. children separated from their parents are alienated from them by telling them of their "abuse" and denying the parent contact on the grounds they are upsetting the child then telling the child the parent abandoned them. the situation is worsening, e.g. newborn babies of first time mothers are being taken into care for possible emotional harm in the future and pregnant mothers are being told that if they do not abort they will lose all their children.
Note the importance of extended family is not valued by the system, where grandparents are often unaware till too late that their grand-kids are going to be adopted. the quality of extended family relationships buffers against negative mental health issues in the parent (leff, 2001).
the deployment of large resources to child protection rather than family support is inefficient and ineffective. a confidential non-punitive approach is preferable, such as a rapid-response, short-term intervention in times of family crisis (pg xix http://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=nBLClXPed08C&oi=fnd&pg=PR13&dq=children%27s+services+uk&ots=S28mJiGNXs&sig=td4sNAIOYUPZZAUasoaFJmxqJwc#v=onepage&q=children%27s%20services%20uk&f=false).
Infanticide may be a natural outcome of a non-supportive child protection system (http://ukpmc.ac.uk/articlerender.cgi?artid=947635 )
Three children are killed by abuse or neglect in England every week
(http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/Ofsted-home/Publications-and-research/Browse-all-by/Annual-Report/2007-08/The-Annual-Report-of-Her-Majesty-s-Chief-Inspector-2007-08). 100-300 children die of abuse or neglect in England and Wales every year (http://www.communitycare.co.uk/Articles/2007/01/11/102713/What-have-we-learned-Child-death-scandals-since-1944.htm; creighton & gallagher, 1988; wilczynski, 1994). kids make up a 1/4 of homicides (gibson, 1975), 80% of child-deaths are babies under the age of 2 (http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?id=2210; durfee & tilton-durfee, 1995; reder & duncan, 1999), and mums are 60% likely to be the kid's killer. 40% of these mums kill impulsively when their baby's behaviour angers them, 10% to get at the kid's father (d'orban, 1979). 30% of deaths are from neglect, and these mums are usually young and don't really want a baby (bonnet, 1993; reder & duncan, 1999). only 25-30% of these murderous mums are mentally ill at the time of murder (d'orban, 1979; reder & duncan, 1999; wilczynski, 1995), though nearly all of them have previously been referred to children's services (falkov, 1996; reder & duncan, 1999) and there is some history of mental weakness somewhere in the family 50% of the time, though their kids are not on the child protection register at the time of death. mums who kill their kids love them and feel guilty afterwards. severely ill women often kill their kids as part of their own suicide because there would be noone left to take care of them (d'orban, 1979). some depressed or psychotic mums threaten to kill the child before they do while even more withdraw from professionals just before committing the murder (reder & duncan, 1999). children are more likely to be killed by their mum's boyfriend than their natural father but this makes up a tiny proportion of cases. partners of perpetrators are rarely (10%) mentally ill (falkov, 1996). ever since the numbers on child protection registers or subject to place of safety orders rose markedly (from 7,600 in 1985 to 29,800 by 1987 and 41,200 by 1989 http://www.communitycare.co.uk/Articles/2007/01/11/102713/What-have-we-learned-Child-death-scandals-since-1944.htm) and more mums are losing their kids (http://www.statistics.gov.uk/STATBASE/xsdataset.asp?vlnk=562&More=Y), infanticide has been rocketing up ((http://www.cypnow.co.uk/news/ByDiscipline/Social-Care/991980/Baby-deaths-result-abuse-rise-Baby-P/; http://kids.nsw.gov.au/kids/kidsstats/agegroups/infancy/trends.cfm). the child protection system is causing mums to hide domestic violence (Royal college of psychiatrists, 2002 a & b), depression (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1120285/Half-new-mothers-suffer-post-natal-depression-lack-families.html; http://www.fassit.co.uk/media/real_story_bbc.wmv, http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,8122-1893626,00.html, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/health/thehealthnews.html?in_article_id=369896&in_page_id=1797, which is a pity because suicide is the biggest killer of young mums http://www.rcpe.ac.uk/journal/issue/journal_35_4/why%20mothers%20die.pdf; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14519602) and mental illness.
children in care are even more likely to suffer neglect and abuse than if kids stayed with their "abusive" mums (http://www.mit.edu/~jjdoyle/doyle_fosterlt_march07_aer.pdf ; http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2007-07-02-foster-study_N.htm; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16478552). children in care are more susceptible to being abused (Dawson, 1989, cited in Waller and Lindsay, 1990). foster children are 7-8 times and children in residential care 6 times more likely to be assessed by a pediatrician for abuse than a child in the general population (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10626608). 25% of convicted child sex offenders worked with children (http://uksocialservices.blogspot.com/2010/04/25-of-convicted-child-sex-offenders.html; http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/374558.stm). fatalities in foster care due to abuse and neglect, although small in absolute numbers, may appear at two to three times the frequency of the general population (New York State Department of Social Services, 1980, cited in Nunno and Motz, 1988). children in care are 3 times as likely to die as other children due to malnutrition and disease, e.g. they don't get immunised or see a dentist
(http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=42559&id=100000785197833&ref=share). looking at council policies, it appears the response to foster care child abuse is that the SW, manager and foster carer sit down to cover it up (http://www.devon.gov.uk/cp_complaints_against_foster_carers_section9.pdf; http://www.wirral.gov.uk/LGCL/100010/200046/159/Safeguarding_children_placed_with_foster_carers.pdf; http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/the-shocking-truth-about-child-abuse-in-northern-ireland-1689396.html; http://www.fosteringsupport.co.uk/documents/police_investigations.pdf).
when children are received into the care system, the first step is to place them with a short-term carer to enable them then to be matched with a long-term carer, depending on the anticipated eventual outcome for the child - adoption, return to birth family or respite care.
Frequent moves are very damaging for the child, leading to lack of trust in adults, disrupted education, loss of friends, disturbed behaviour, attachment disorders, etc.
a foster setting for very young children and babies was investigated and it was found that both the male and female carers hardly ever spoke to any of the children they looked after and certainly never played with or spent time other than changing nappies or feeding them. Each child in that environment was much quieter that most other children and certainly more passive. It may have been the carers’ way of coping with the loss of each successive child but it was a huge price for each child to pay. Under-stimulation at this stage can have detrimental effects on the potential of children (http://www.childrenwebmag.com/articles/foster-care/attachment-during-a-foster-care-placement). State care predisposes to a pattern of hyperactivity/inattention
(http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=10993). Researchers have identified changes in brain chemistry resulting from
lack of love in early years. This could lead to drugs that help undo
the damage, they say (http://www.world-science.net/othernews/051121_neglectfrm.htm).
68,000 children in the UK are in public care, with two-thirds in foster care. three in four children in care leave formal education with no qualifications, compared with only 6% of the general population (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/374558.stm). One in every four foster kids will become incarcerated with the first 2 years of leaving foster care. More than 20 percent will become homeless (http://www.ehow.co.uk/facts_4884577_facts-children-foster-care.html).
Children who have been in the care system are far more likely to become teenage parents than their peers. There is a very negative, repeated cycle ith children in care having children– they have children, and their children go through the care system again. Parents who have been through the care system are twice as likely to lose the right to care for their own children. More than half of all children in care leave school with no formal qualifications. Just 6% enter higher education. Since the vast majority of children in care are in foster care, any improvements to these outcomes will have to come through reform of the fostering system.
fostering is one of the few reliable ways to earn a living if you have no qualifications and you want to work at home; between 30% and 40% of foster carers have no educational qualifications. carers take on children who are verbally abusive, physically abusive or have serious hygiene problems.
(http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2010/feb/05/britains-foster-care-crisis).
so, knowing that mums are gonna come off SS at risk registers and kill their kids, unless they don't come off SS registers and the state kills the kids, stop getting kids off parents, set up free anonymous permanent support through the GP, children's centre, jobcentre or playscheme (like sort out their debts and set up their careers and get them the childcare. if they want a break from the kids for two weeks, give the kids back afterwards so they trust you and will ask again. let parents visit their kids at the foster carers to work with them, like parents have to work with teachers. make sure these kids get regular time with extended family who provide the best defence against maternal ill-health, like weekends with other parent/grand-parents, or part of father's contribution to child-support directly allocated to travel and courses). use SS unique inter-disciplinary position to hassle other departments to target the care they are supposed to provide.
Yours sincerely,
Shamim Khaliq (a mum who's been under investigation for over a year)
GMC
shamimkhaliq@hotmail.com
gmc@gmc-uk.org
16/05/10
Re: Failing Child Protection Services
To whoever it concerns,
G.P.s throughout the UK must be aware of families under intense pressure due to the child protection system? I am a mother that has been under investigation for over a year so I lost my job (even if my child is no longer on the “at risk” register, the fact that a section 47 investigation ocurred will show up on an extended CRB check so I cannot teach again, my career of 20 years) and showed symptoms of stress (my hair greyed, daily vomitting, monthly fainting, sleeplessness, worry...). I write to you, and the police who must also know about this unfair stress on mothers at critical times for bonding, hoping you can make those in power aware of ground-level corruption in children's services. Evidence that suggests you are aware includes the fact that doctors and policemen never attend children's core conferences.
Social Services (SS) were called in by the police when I called them when my brother attacked me when my child was at school so my child and I fled my parents' to a homeless hostel till we could find our own place. SS on paper said that I was emotionally abusing my child by subjecting him to domestic violence. SS thought I had mental health problems on first meeting me so they took my kid from school with no explanation and a team of 5 mental health experts grilled me for an hour at midnight. They thought I might have a thyroid condition and drugs could help. The social worker (SW) hassled me and my doctor to open up my medical records and proceeded to try to get my kid off me for being “post-natally depressed”; my argument that my mood was actually very positive post-natally because I was taking antidepressants fell on deaf ears. The SW told me to get myself referred to a psychiatrist via my GP, which I did and the result came back “emotionally-impulsive but needing no support”. So SS told me to see their psychologist who told me his job was to see if there was enough evidence to take me to children's court where he would be the expert witness testifying against me.
I am now fearful of having an “unclean medical record” and cannot decide if I should get treatment for my personality disorder as suggested by the SS psychologist, or do not need treatment as suggested by the GP-referred psychologist. I am fearful because I know 2 mums who lost their kids because SS said they needed support with mental health problems but, because the GP couldn't find any, they didn't get the treatment.
GPs should have a bigger role in child protection. Professionals with an area of expertise that measure directly are far better judges of risk to children than SS who focus on the negative (http://www.parental-alienation.info/publications/14-recresintrisassofchi.htm).
once an allegation of child abuse is made, social workers begin with an assumption that the abuse has occurred and their investigations are skewed toward providing evidence to support the allegation and not to take an impartial, even-handed or open-minded approach. evidence which can exonerate parents is often disregarded, ignored or withheld, or in some instances the evidence against them is distorted, embellished and fabricated (Prosser and Lewis, 1992; 1995).
evidence is often faulty due to biased or dishonest reporting or errors in communication and SS are slow to revise their judgements despite a mounting body of evidence against them. SWs rely heavily on faulty intuitive skills; SWs' first impression of a family has enduring impact and parents' reactions to professionals during the investigation are taken as representative of the quality of parenting normally available to the child. SS are sceptical about information when it conflicts with their view of the family but are uncritical when the new evidence supports their view. children’s testimony is accepted when it corroborates the social worker’s assessment and doubted when it challenges it. Evidence from members of the public is completely ignored and written evidence is repeatedly overlooked in preference for direct reports from those present. Research on child abuse is under-used (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/358/1/Common_errors_of_reasoning_1999.pdf).
the story of children being taken away from good parents and then abused in foster care, where abuse is covered up, and children's services monitoring as abused children are slowly killed by their parents, is common to the US, UK, Australia and Canada... children's services are removing kids from good parents and leaving kids with bad by not investigating and relying on hearsay and first impressions instead. having decided on the basis of conventionality that a parent poses a risk, they look to manufacture evidence that they fall into the following categories: men (though as they cannot say it is because they are a man, they look for un-investigated claims of aggression against the men instead), single parents, people who are ill (don't put your kids in care temporarily because you won't get them back), parents who've been attacked, postnatally depressed (even when the medication is working), disabled (they do not check if you have corrected to normal capacity), mentally ill (children's services psychologists find anyone who is not self-actualised to have a mental illness), those who have been in care or have a child in care, the non-resident parent almost always loses their case, if one child is injured or dies through no fault of the parent the parent loses all the children for not assessing risk, which is also the reason given why extended family lose adoption rights if they have supported the parent found wanting. they ignore evidence from the public completely and even ignore counter-evidence from professionals or the opinion of the child. the children's courts, where parents never win, are even more corrupt; parents have no say, non-children's services professionals are not invited to contradict slander and written testimonies from them are ignored, allowing hearsay which is slanted against the defendant, children's services are not prosecuted for perjury, and parents are gagged afterwards so the miscarriage of justice cannot be made public. infants are adopted and lose their extended family forever, and government has adoption targets to meet and makes money through this system. children separated from their parents are alienated from them by telling them of their "abuse" and denying the parent contact on the grounds they are upsetting the child then telling the child the parent abandoned them. the situation is worsening, e.g. newborn babies of first time mothers are being taken into care for possible emotional harm in the future and pregnant mothers are being told that if they do not abort they will lose all their children. countries like Sweden that have a system that keeps families together and supports parents have better outcomes for children. the outcomes for children in care are so appalling that the children are better off with their "abusive" parents. if the child protection services were completely closed down in these countries, fewer children would be abused.
Yours sincerely,
Shamim Khaliq
footnote:
there is a variation between countries and within countries. in the US judges have more power so decide on the basis of their own personal prejudices, e.g. against men. in the UK, this behaviour is only common in ground level children's workers and judges just rubber-stamp their decisions.
Statistics showing infanticide may be a natural outcome of a non-supportive child protection system
kids make up a 1/4 of homicides, 80% babies under the age of 2, and mums are 60% likely to be the kid's killer. 40% of these mums kill impulsively when their baby's behaviour angers them, 10% to get at the kid's father. 30% of deaths are from neglect, and these mums are usually young and don't really want a baby. only 25% of these murderous mums are mentally ill at the time of murder, though nearly all of them have previously been referred to children's services and there is some history of mental weakness somewhere in the family 50% of the time, though their kids are not on the child protection register at the time of death. mums who kill their kids love them and feel guilty afterwards. children are more likely to be killed by their mum's boyfriend than their natural father but this makes up a tiny proportion of cases. partners of perpetrators are rarely (10%) mentally ill. ever since current child protection measures have come into force so more mums are losing their kids, infanticide has been rocketing up. the child protection system is causing mums to hide depression and mental illness. children in care are even more likely to die from neglect and abuse than if kids stayed with their "abusive" mums. countries where mums got trained and hired in preference over immigrants with family-supportive policies like being able to take days off work to go to school assemblies have less abuse.
My story is at: http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=115499151818317&id=632569856&ref=nf
further research at: http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=117098038325095&id=632569856&ref=mf
LETTER TO MP
shamimkhaliq@hotmail.com
novellm@parliament.uk
tel/fax 0121 603 2299
11/05/10
Re: Failing Child Protection Services
Dear MP,
I am writing to ask that you intervene to stop this ludicrous child protection system that has destroyed my career and health through over a year's harassment before deeming my child to not be at risk and leaving us fearful of contact with authorities. Looking at statistics, mums come off SS “at risk” registers and kill their kids, unless they don't come off SS registers and the state kills their kids. So, stop getting kids off parents, set up free anonymous long-term support through the GP, children's centre, job-centre or play-scheme (like sort out debts and set up careers and get childcare, whatever the parent wants. If parents want a break from the kids for two weeks, give the kids back afterwards so they trust you and will ask again. Let parents visit their kids at the foster carers to work with them, like parents have to work with teachers. Make sure kids get regular time with extended family who provide the best defence against maternal ill-health, like weekends with other parent/grand-parents, or part of father's contribution to child-support directly allocated to travel and courses). Use SS unique inter-disciplinary position to hassle other departments to provide the care they are supposed to. Recruit social workers from other caring professions so they are less likely to be on a personal crusade.
the story of children being taken away from good parents and then abused in foster care, where abuse is covered up, and children's services monitoring as abused children are slowly killed by their parents, is common to the US, UK, Australia and Canada... children's services are removing kids from good parents and leaving kids with bad by not investigating and relying on hearsay and first impressions instead. they are poor judges of risk because they have no speciality, do not directly measure and focus on the negative. having decided on the basis of conventionality that a parent poses a risk, they look to manufacture evidence that they fall into the following categories: men (though as they cannot say it is because they are a man, they look for un-investigated claims of aggression against the men instead), single parents, people who are ill (don't put your kids in care temporarily because you won't get them back), parents who've been attacked, postnatally depressed (even when the medication is working), disabled (they do not check if you have corrected to normal capacity), mentally ill (children's services psychologists find anyone who is not self-actualised to have a mental illness), those who have been in care or have a child in care, the non-resident parent almost always loses their case, if one child is injured or dies through no fault of the parent the parent loses all the children for not assessing risk, which is also the reason given why extended family lose adoption rights if they have supported the parent found wanting. they ignore evidence from the public completely and even ignore counter-evidence from professionals or the opinion of the child. the children's courts, where parents never win, are even more corrupt; parents have no say, non-children's services professionals are not invited to contradict slander and written testimonies from them are ignored, allowing hearsay which is slanted against the defendant, children's services are not prosecuted for perjury, and parents are gagged afterwards so the miscarriage of justice cannot be made public. infants are adopted and lose their extended family forever, and government has adoption targets to meet and makes money through this system. children separated from their parents are alienated from them by telling them of their "abuse" and denying the parent contact on the grounds they are upsetting the child then telling the child the parent abandoned them. the situation is worsening, e.g. newborn babies of first time mothers are being taken into care for possible emotional harm in the future and pregnant mothers are being told that if they do not abort they will lose all their children. countries like Sweden that have a system that keeps families together and supports parents have better outcomes for children. the outcomes for children in care are so appalling that the children are better off with their "abusive" parents. if the child protection services were completely closed down in these countries, fewer children would be abused.
Yours sincerely,
Shamim Khaliq
We are sick and tired of the child molesters who are running the UK Government and the world through the churchs/Pope & Queen
We have Kenneth Clarke & George Osborn the rockerfella puppets put in place by common purpose loving David Cameron
does nayone beleive we will get rid ot all teh sick child abusing judges & SS whilst these are in charge of covering up child abuse in some cases their own - KEN
Britain's child snatchers are a scandal
The UK's system of forced adoption requires the Government's urgent attention, says Christopher Booker
Is any human instinct more fundamental than the love of a mother for her children? Last week I reported how Maureen Spalek from Liverpool had been arrested and held in a cell for 24 hours for sending a birthday card to her son, one of three children taken away from her by a family court, despite its agreeing that she was "an excellent mother".
In Runcorn magistrates' court on Wednesday Mrs Spalek was told she must return for a pre-trial hearing, before her criminal charge of sending a birthday card goes for trial at a Crown Court. Last month, Mrs Spalek was one of 200 mothers who gathered in Stafford to set up a group known as Child Snatching by the State. They were addressed by Ian Josephs, a businessman based in Monaco, who has championed the cause of parents whose children were unjustly removed by social workers ever since he was a Tory county councillor in the 1960s.
As Mr Josephs describes on his Forced Adoptions website, he has dealt with hundreds of such harrowing cases (always being careful to check that there was no evidence of physical or emotional harm to the children). One is that of Sarah White, repeatedly arrested for attempting to contact her "stolen children", including an instance when she was jailed for a month for waving to her son when she unexpectedly saw him across the street. Two weeks ago, she was again held in custody for five hours,
after her brother posted a YouTube video describing her plight.
Julie Cipriani is another mother arrested for waving to her child in the street and forbidden from further contact after reading out in court her daughter's loving birthday card.
When another mother threatened with having her baby abducted recently fled to Ireland, her family were repeatedly visited by police, demanding to know her whereabouts. She is now receiving much more humane treatment from Irish social services. (Britain is almost the only country in Europe that permits forced adoptions against the wishes of loving parents.)
In the Commons last October, the Tory MP Tim Yeo described a case where Suffolk social workers waited until the father was out of the house to snatch an 11-week-old baby from the arms of its distraught mother, in order to put the child out for adoption. Until recently social workers were set "adoption targets" by the government, as part of a system where it seems they, the courts and the police are too often conspiring to abduct children from loving parents in the name of what amounts to heartless "social engineering". Few scandals call for more urgent attention by our new Parliament than this.
Post a Comment